It's like stuff that is like so over at this point.
It's so over.
The left's overreaction, the left's reaction to it in some places was so over the top.
It was like me and two other colleagues who were there, who were outside.
I mean, we were just like, dude, come on.
Like, we were not in any danger.
Matthew Rosenberg is a Pulitzer Prize winning national security correspondent for the New York Times.
In multiple meetings with one of our undercover journalists, Rosenberg reveals a lot about the inner workings and inner turmoil at the Times.
For starters, he doesn't hesitate to undermine his own paper's coverage of the events that took place in our nation's capital on January 6th, 2021,
and chides corporate media's reaction, or in his own words, overreaction.
Like, I think you can tell how much fun we had on January 6th.
Oh, that's great.
Are you allowed to have that much fun on January 6th?
Aren't you supposed to be warning?
I know, I know.
It's also if you're traumatized.
All these colleagues who are in the building.
Oh my God, this is so scary.
I'm like, oh, f**k off.
Is that really the vibe, Matt?
From them.
I'm like, come on.
It's not the kind of place I can sit and tell somebody to man up, but I kind of want to.
You're like, dude, come on.
Like, we were not in any danger.
These clips, these clips are amazing.
We've got them up on the site.
The link back to Veritas.
I don't know how you do this.
I don't know how you get these undercover, O'Keefe, but you've perfected the model.
I just want to make sure everybody understands something.
This guy is as big as they get.
He's a Pulitzer Prize winning national security.
He's dialed in deep.
You talk about the deep state, the administrative state.
This guy is the press officer.
This is where the leaks come through.
This guy's almost got a security clearance.
He doesn't technically, but he does because they're leaking to him all the time.
The biggest reveal of all the stuff there is that there were, and his thing, yeah, the
FBI, this is like, they're feds at this.
James O'Keefe.
Steve, I mean, yeah, the quote was, there are a ton of FBI informants among the people
who attacked the Capitol.
This is a national security reporter for the New York Times.
Is he a spook?
Well, he's a, I call it a stool pigeon for the spooks.
They use him.
Usually it's people in power manipulating the journalists, not the other way around.
And he says that January 6th was, quote, no big deal.
Steve, now this video has gone viral.
It had close to a million views.
Twitter took the video down.
I'm not sure why they took my video down.
I'm quoting the New York Times reporter.
He did not know he was being recorded, but he knew he was being spoken to.
He said, quote, I was, and two other colleagues were outside of the Capitol building on January
6th having fun.
And he minimizes the trauma that apparently other New York Times reporters have felt about
January 6th.
He calls them, his words, quote, effing bitches.
And Steve, I can report to you that a lot of people in the New York Times are not happy
about what this man, Matthew Goldstein, has said.
I've reached out to some of those folks.
My colleagues have gotten some reactions.
They're very unhappy about this at the New York Times.
And one of the things they're most unhappy about is that we caught him talking about
his sources at the CIA.
Matthew Rosenberg says that he gets around the polygraph tests at the CIA sources, talk
to intermediaries who talk to Rosenberg, to which I asked Rosenberg in person yesterday.
Doesn't that taint the information you're getting when you go through all these intermediaries?
I don't report anything unless I can see it come out of the person's mouth.
You're getting hearsay accounts from individuals speaking as intermediaries with your CIA sources.
Pretty extraordinary recording, Steve.
Not sure, dude.
This is a blockbuster.
When I saw this, my jaw dropped.
Of all the great work you've done, and your work is great and it gets greater every time,
I said this one's a bombshell about the national security reporting, about their number.
And as usual, O'Keefe's timing is exquisite.
Why?
Yesterday, one of the individuals got 20 years in a federal prison.
20.
He was sentenced to 20 years in a federal prison.
Right.
Found guilty.
He got up to 20 years in a federal prison for this the same day O'Keefe drops this.
O'Keefe, the guy admits they're federal agents, informants all over the place, federal assets
all over the place.
He's talking about, hey, it wasn't that big a deal.
We're laughing.
Tell me, where are you going to take this story?
I understand the Times, I'm sure, is a meltdown.
Where is James O'Keefe going to drive this story?
Well, it's a constant struggle, Steve.
Inch by inch, distribution by proxy on all the platforms, Twitter.
We're not even on Twitter.
The story was trending on Twitter this morning.
We have another installment, which I'll give you a tease, exclusive to The War Room here.
Tonight, at 7.30 or so, we're going to release the next tape where this man, Rosenberg, talks
about the, quote, internal tug of war at The New York Times between, I'm quoting him now.
This is his quote.
This is pretty extraordinary that he said this, not me.
Quote, some of the crazier leftist SHIT that's worked its way at The New York Times.
And he talks about the irrationality in this leftist ideology.
He talks about his lawsuit with Project Veritas.
Again, he's secretly recorded saying this.
He said, we effed up with Project Veritas.
And he talks about the P-tape and his sources at the NSA that this P-tape was made up and
he called it ridiculous.
So this is part two tonight coming out.
Wow.
You have video tape that's happening.
And this is really important, Steve.
You and I have known each other for 11 years.
To see the way the media works with these administrative agencies and how they make
this stuff up and they brag about it, it's pretty extraordinary to get these confessions
from a national security reporter.
No, he's the press officer.
He's the press officer for the administrator for the deep state.
He told you, CIA, and how they get around the lie detector test of the CIA.
This is all thought through.
It's not random.
OK, so it's 730 tonight and people should go to Veritas.
I guess you can't tweet it out.
James, I think I understand now why the FBI battered down your door and dragged you out
in your skivvies.
I think I'm getting the picture now why the FBI would want to do that.
I hope the FBI and all these groups are watching this because what we're doing now is we're
showing the whole world, Matthew Rosenberg, Mark Mazzetti, I confronted Mark Mazzetti,
and now maybe they'll think twice.
These federal agencies will think twice about going to these folks and see their unethical
behavior.
And we're shining a light on all of them.
And yes, Steve, they were trying to intimidate you, but we're not going to be intimidated.
We have part two tonight.
We're going to release the confrontation with these individuals and you're going to see
him talk about his sources at the National Security Agency, a first in American history.
You're going to see how it works between the press office at The New York Times and the
NSA.
Wow.
The puzzle palace.
James, heroic work.
Part two out tonight.
You know what I think?
And I would say everybody, because we know the FBI and the CIA, they watch the show.
We want all patriots and whistleblowers to contact Project Veritas and talk to the man,
James O'Keefe.
Tell your story.
Come forward and tell your story to James O'Keefe.
That's what we need to see.
We need to see patriots start to come forward.
O'Keefe.
Veritas Tips, V-E-R-I-T-A-S Tips at Protonmail.com.
If you're watching this, I know you are, and you work for these agencies like the DOJ.
I mean, talk to us.
Send us an encrypted message.
Be brave.
We need people to speak up.
Accountability.
People say, what's going to happen to these people?
Well, information is the accountability that you seek.
It's sunlight.
We either have to have informed consent.
We need to show people what's happening in this country, or we have to use coercion.
And I don't believe in that.
I don't believe in violence or coercive.
We have to educate people and shine a light.
And these stories that we're doing tonight and yesterday on New York Times national security
reporters telling you how they manufacture consent and lie to you in conjunction with
these agencies, this is everything.
This is the reason why we have all the problems in our country.
And I think it will deter them, Steve Bannon.
I think it will deter The New York Times from doing these games.
And I can tell you right now, I can report to you that there is a civil war inside The
New York Times, a tug of war, according to this man.
You'll see more about that tonight.
Tonight 730 in Veritas.
We'll be pushing it out all over.
O'Keefe, I got to tell you, you were taking, by the way, and now they're trying to manufacture
consent on this war.
O'Keefe is more central now than he's ever been.
James, thank you.
You're a hero and a patriot.
You really are.
What's the over and under?
Who goes to prison first, O'Keefe or Bannon?
That's a question out there.
Just toss it out there.
I got to say, the only thing I hear about jail is that I won't have my pillow, my special
pillow, be falsely accused.
I say, what do you fear?
What are you afraid of?
Well, I'm usually a fearless guy, but I like my particular type of pillow I sleep with
at night, Steve.
But I will be innocent, falsely accused, if they ever cross that Rubicon with me.
But we have to be willing to be falsely accused in this business.
Well, you have no fear.
They've been after you for years, brother, and you're still breaking massive stories
like this.
O'Keefe, you're a hero.
Thank you, sir.