when you and your colleagues were trying to decide
which route to go down, the traditional vaccine route
or the mRNA route.
You write that it was, quote,
most counterintuitive to go the mRNA route
and yet you went that route.
Explain why.
It was counterintuitive because Pfizer was mastering,
or let's say we had very good experience and expertise
with the multiple technologies that would give a vaccine.
Adenoviruses, like some of the other vaccines are.
We were very good in doing that.
Protein vaccines, we were very good in doing that
and plus many other technologies.
mRNA was the technology, but we had less experience,
only two years working on this.
And actually mRNA was a technology
that never delivered a single product until that day.
Not vaccine, not any other medicine.
So it was very counterintuitive and I was surprised
when they suggested to me that this is the way to go
and I questioned it and I asked them to justify it.
How can you say something like that?
But they came and they were very, very convinced
that this is the right way to go.
They felt that the two years of work on mRNA since 2018,
together with BioNTech to develop a flu vaccine,
made them believe that the technology is mature
and we are at the cusp of delivering a product.
So they convinced me.
I follow my instinct that they know what they are saying.
They're very good.
And we made this very difficult decision.
Okay, I wanna bring in now Dr. Naomi Wolf.
Dr. Wolf, did my ears hear me correctly?
Is he disavowing, that's the CEO of Pfizer.
You're deep into the 55,000 pages with the war room posse
and lawyers that are volunteer.
We're gonna get all up there on that.
But he just came in today and didn't say fourth booster,
but is he disavowing the path that they took?
You know this better than I do.
This is not my line of country.
What did we just hear?
There for all to see and hear.
And that was the Washington Post quickly doing
what I think is damage control related to the work
that Ed Dowd and you and your amazing 12 or 1300 volunteers
going through the Pfizer documents.
I think this is a response, honestly.
He basically said, you know,
they told me it was gonna work.
They told me it was okay,
but we have no real experience with it
except for the last two years
and they've never made a product with it before.
Literally that was the CEO of Pfizer saying that
in the same 48 hour period that he then said
of this mystery product of which he has no knowledge
and takes no responsibility,
you need a fourth booster, a fourth dose.
So it's surreal, it's terrifying.
And I suspect there's a lot behind the scenes
that we don't know about some kind of obligation
that I don't even understand to push a fourth dose,
but at the same time, try to lay down
like all the main evil doers are doing right now,
a nominal paper trail saying, wasn't me.
Rochelle Walensky is doing the same thing.
You know, it was just guidance.
You know, it's like asking for fries at Shake Shack.
You know, I didn't tell people what to do.
I didn't have any knowledge of, you know,
what was in this stuff.
It's extraordinary.
Okay, so one thing you've become with the Daily Cloud
and going after the states,
and we've tried to be here in this Ukraine war
and other things.
So the CCP virus is the still point in the turning world
that you can actually have people
let build their own intellectual frameworks,
their own mental maps,
and then they can kind of see
all this disparate information come with them.
The 55,000 pages of documentation,
you now have a volunteer team,
your team put this great site together,
this volunteer team of 12 or 1300 folks from the war room,
what, almost 200 lawyers,
165 lawyers going through this in detail.
And that is, those documents were negotiated,
besides there are no liabilities,
it was negotiated that it would be, I don't know,
70 years, somebody told me that you wouldn't see the,
bigger than the,
it's bigger than the Kennedy assassination, right?
Not in your life, remember they said that,
Earl Warren said, not in your lifetime,
not in your lifetime.
And hey, he's dead right.
A lot of people's lifetime, we still haven't released him,
but this was gonna be another 70 years.
Where do we stand right now with your project
to let the American people crowdsource a knowledge program
to get to the bottom of what happened?
So this, you know, this model, as I said before,
I'm gonna say it even more so,
is proving out to be quite revolutionary.
every day the research teams find and surface important new documentation and then that goes
over to the lawyers. And we're going to have a webinar on the 23rd about how to file criminal
charges so that it's not just civil actions that these people are facing but criminal. But can I
just, I'm a little bit in shock today, like every time the research team brings me what they found
my level of trying to tolerate shock has to go higher and higher. I would like to share with
your community a finding that reached me from the research team yesterday which is pretty terrifying
and I think people need to know about it. Yes ma'am, go ahead. Thank you so much. So this was
leaked to me, it's directly from the AMA but it's also replicated in the documents. It's appendix Q,
severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus COVID-19 vaccines. And what it is, is a table
that goes to doctors with vaccine codes and dosages. And many people have said, and this was
one thing that led me not to want to take, there you go, not to want to take the vaccine. Many
people who are nurses and pharmacists have been whistleblowing and saying, you know, the ingredients
are not in the sheet that goes with the package, it's blank. And that's been correct. But here if
you're a doctor you can get, or a medical insider, you can get this table. All right, so this table
is pretty terrifying because there's been work that's been done that I thought was preliminary
but this confirms it, that there are different batches essentially with different codes, you
know, serial numbers basically, and that they are having different effects. There's a website called
howbadismybatch.com, I believe, that is looking at symptoms in the VAERS database that relate
to different kinds of serial numbers. Well this is the other side of that. It would appear, and again
this is over to the doctors, over the lawyers to validate, but it would appear, and you can see for
yourself, that it lists a series of codes. They all start with 913 but they end in 00, 05, 07,
and they do appear to be different batches. There's a whole series that are left out and you
can find them elsewhere which is concerning, and that series is called vaccines slash toxoids
and vaccines slash toxoids guidelines. But look, just looking at this series, which is about 12
batches, they have different dosages. They have different dosages. It says mRNA LNP, which is the
lipid nanoparticle spike protein preservative-free, and then the first one is 30 micrograms, the second
one is also 30 micrograms, these are Pfizer, but then there's 10 micrograms, also Pfizer, and then
Moderna has 100 micrograms, and then Pfizer has 3 micrograms, and these are different batches,
and then Moderna has 50 micrograms, and another Moderna has 50 micrograms, and then you go,
so just in those like 8 or 9 batches that I've just read that end in 00, 05, 07, 01, 08,
different people are getting different dosages of the active and possibly the dangerous ingredients,
and the reason I find this so important, especially with the work that you've been
doing to showcase Edward Dowd's colleagues' charts where they've broken down deaths and
plotted them on a timeline with boosters and with the first and second injections, there was a huge
spike, as I recall, of millennial deaths right around the time the boosters were rolled out,
and if you look at this table, it would appear that some batches could have more of the spike
protein, more of the lipid nanoparticles, which I'm persuaded are so problematic,
you know, than others, and so this is truly shocking, and they're not adjusted for weight or size,
right, so if you're a 100-pound woman or a teenager, you're not getting any less in these high
LNP, high spike protein dosages than a 300-pound six-foot man, and then lastly, over to the right,
the table shows, first of all, it shows this is an undated document, but it shows that they already
planned a fourth dose and a booster, but also when it says second dose to third dose,
CDC-recommended populations is, for example, immunocompromised. This is not supposed to be
for everyone, according to this internal document. It's targeted to frail populations,
vulnerable populations, where the risk-benefit equation is
going to make more sense to take what Bourla has now called a risky injection.
So to me, this is, you know, quite terrifying.
The other thing that comes up is that there are two different solutions.
This may or may not be relevant.
But I mean, literally, this is an experiment, you don't know what you're getting.
And I guess the last thing I want to say, and again, I am not a medical doctor.
So you know, this is now over to the doctors over to the lawyers for, you know, triple
and quadruple review and explication.
But what's scary to me is that doctors would have known this.
Doctors would have seen these codes, seen these different dosages, known, you know,
been able to look at the vial and know, oh, this is a 50 microgram dose, this is 100 microgram
dose, this is a, you know, three microgram dose, and, and didn't alert people that there
are different batches with different levels of the active ingredients in this vaccine.
So this is all pretty shocking.
Dr. Wolf, we got about a minute.
How do people join up and assist you?
You've got what 12 or 1300 volunteers now, how do people go to this site and find out
more about you and the work that's being done?
Yeah, please come to research at daily cloud.io.
And then you'll get assigned one of six different groups and also go to daily cloud.io campaigns
over there on the right, choose the Pfizer campaign and sign up and you'll get an email
and a form and you can go ahead and get to work but please support each other emotionally
and including, you know, all of us who are learning this because this is truly, truly
disturbing.
Dr. Wolf, great work.
Thank you for joining us.