in prayer. So let's let's open in prayer and give this time to the Lord and see what he wants to do
with it. So we just thank you, we just come before you and give you praise that you are the God of
above all things. You're the God of this creation, the God above it all, and you hold it all in your
hands. And so we just thank you as we commit this time to you, that you use this to your plans and
to your purposes, that we can learn what it is and how it is to live in your abundant life and
your abundant health that you destined and sent your son Jesus for us to have. So we just thank
you for that in Jesus name. Amen. Okay. So what I thought I just quickly kick off on because it's
become, it's timely, it's in the media again now. So I thought I'd touch this off because probably
some of you might have seen this or be starting to think about this. And that is that this question
of flu as compared to COVID. And so I've done a series, I've just done a series, part of why I've
been needing this time out, I've just completed a series of videos, there's eight in total, I think
one's already made it out through the system perhaps, but there's a series of eight now in total.
And they're based off the Australian ABS stats and then other stats. But one of the things that
came out of the analysis at ABS stats is very much this question of flu and pneumonia.
Probably a lot of you noticed that through the COVID time, there was no talk of flu,
flu just disappeared. Yeah. Did everyone kind of notice that? The flu quickly disappeared.
So what's interesting about that is that in 2018, we had 3,000 in Australia,
3,000 flu and pneumonia deaths. In 2019, we had 4,000 flu and pneumonia deaths, right? These are
ABS real Australian stats. So what did we have for flu and pneumonia in 2020 and 2021? Well,
the figure dropped to 1,000 and then 1,900. And in that total figure, there was only for 2021,
sorry, for 2020, 55 recorded cases of flu and for 2021, five. So basically flu disappeared
in the official records. So the question gets raised, well, did flu really disappear?
And so that's our first thing to ask. And so flu, of course, is a respiratory infection
that typically takes out your elderly. Pneumonia has long been known as the old man's best friend.
It has long been known, centuries, as the thing that would tend to take out your elderly once
something happened and they were bedridden and then pneumonia would take them out. So there's
nothing new about that. That's been around forever. So what's interesting here is that
you would think, okay, if we've got a real problem with the COVID, shouldn't we be seeing
excess mortality? Shouldn't we be seeing excess deaths in that category? But we're not. When we
come back and look at their total analysis of it all, there wasn't any excess mortality.
And it just looks like flu stepped sideways and COVID stepped into the spot that flu was.
So, okay, that's it on numbers. Why might that be so? Well, of course, the people who like to say
that the mandates are great and you're asking is great and the shutting down borders
works will say, well, that's just because we kept the flu out. Maybe. But even if we did just
keep the flu out, all that happened was COVID stepped in and took the place that flu was. COVID
did not cause any more extra deaths. Coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, I should say, which becomes the COVID
picture. So there's two separate things. There's the virus and there's disputes even with that.
There's the virus and then there's the disease picture that we are attributing to the virus.
So the disease picture, COVID, we attribute to the virus SARS-CoV-2. So what about that step
in there, attributing COVID to SARS-CoV-2? What's our validity in that? And that's where we come to
our questions of diagnosis. So how are we diagnosing or confirming that people have
actually got SARS-CoV-2? This is a whole separate question as compared to, have they got the flu?
Because the test that we've been using for years...
is for these couple of years to do that,
the real-time PCR test,
which is a DNA amplification test.
It's like looking for a needle in a haystack.
That DNA amplification test,
the original developer of that test,
a Karl Mullins, who was a Nobel Prize winner,
who intriguingly died in June of 2019,
just before all of this happened,
was on record before his death
as saying that this real-time PCR test
cannot be used for diagnosis.
This test cannot be used for diagnosis.
That's not what it's for.
So here we have a test
that the original developer of the test says
can't be used to diagnose
whether you've got a disease process or not.
Being used to diagnose whether people have got SARS-CoV-2.
Now, how accurate is it for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2
as compared to other things?
So this is where it gets very interesting.
There was a particular African president
who happened to have been a chemist.
He was Christian.
He was a chemist and he decided to test
the real use of real-time PCR test
to test a number of organic substances.
And every one of these organic substances he tested
also tested positive on the real-time PCR test.
So interesting, not proof of anything, but interesting.
Also interesting that he was one of a number
of African presidents who were assassinated
in this timeframe.
Interesting, not proof of anything, but interesting.
So then we have that the USA,
both the CDC and the FDA last year at different stages.
First, it was the FDA, then the CDC.
So June and then December came out saying
that they're taking away the verification
for the real-time PCR.
They're taking away that being able to be used to test
because they admitted that it could not also test,
determine whether it was flu or not.
That requires a separate test or an added on test
which most people just weren't doing.
Yeah, he used some animals.
He used goat.
He also used, I forget everything else.
I think there was Kiwi fruit
and there were a few other things Yolanda that he used.
But all the organic things, the point here
is the living things he tested turned up positive.
The inorganic was he also tested,
I think a petroleum-based product came back negative.
So in other words, the point I'm making there
is that real-time PCR is not a specific test.
It's not a specific test.
The other thing about your real-time PCR
is it works on cycle counts.
And it's like a bit, think of it
like using a magnifying glass to look at something.
The more you use your magnifying glass to look down,
the more you might be missing a whole heap of other things
while you're busy looking at this one tiny little thing
that you're magnifying down on.
So what we know with the real-time PCR tests,
and again, many scientists have come out and verified this,
that once we get below 27 cycle thresholds,
then the likelihood of actually finding an intact virus
that actually is the part of a problem
is increasingly less than basically zero.
So by the time you get to 42 cycle thresholds,
so Australia, and I don't know about New Zealand,
Australian labs are routinely running
42 to 44 cycle thresholds,
which means there will be an extremely high,
some scientists are saying 92, 94% false positive rate
because it's been so amplified
that it is picking up a whole heap of goodness knows what,
but it can't actually tell you whether that's SARS-CoV-2.
Maybe it was the flu.
Maybe it was, we don't know.
And we're never going to know because that's retrospective.
We can't go back and retest.
So it is interesting that,
as we look at all of these figures,
we need to bear in mind that this was done
on the back of a form of diagnostic testing
that the developer of that test himself said is not valid.
And yet this is what we've based everything on.
So did we actually have flu disappear in that time,
or was an awful lot of what was being counted
as SARS-CoV-2,
or was an awful lot of what was counted as SARS-CoV-2,
actually, the flu?
We will never know for sure,
but it basically SARS-CoV-2,
whichever way it is, SARS-CoV-2,
what was called SARS-CoV-2,
took out that section of the population
who would be at highest risk from the flu in any case.
So there's a huge amount of overlap.
What's interesting is that they've now flipped,
and as Yolanda picked up,
they've now flipped from recommending
the real-time PCR test to recommending the RAC test.
And I find that intriguing,
because only six months ago,
no, maybe a bit earlier than that,
earlier in the piece,
I spoke directly to them.
head microbiologist of one of our Sydney labs
about this question of, well, why can't we use
the rapid antigen testing?
And they were saying, oh, no, we can't use that.
We have to use the real-time PCR.
So the rapid antigen testing is more specific
but less sensitive.
But even that now is being called into question.
But it is more specific, as in, if it turns positive,
then it's more likely to be correct.
But it's not so sensitive, as in, you can get other things.
Well, and see, even there on the specificity,
even that's being called into question
because we've discovered that you can alter
the results of the rapid antigen test
by putting on various other, let's say,
acidic and other chemical substances.
So the accuracy of that's being called into account,
into question as well.
Possibly the only accurate way is to do serology.
There are so many questions around all of this.
But anyway, putting that aside,
the real question here is, well,
what's the issue with flu and pneumonia?
The problem is that if you're watching the media,
they are starting to talk again about the flu.
And they're starting to warn people,
watch out, this season, there is going to be a new strain
of flu coronavirus.
It's like, well, excuse me,
the virologists should be piping up and telling them,
flu and coronavirus are two totally different
categories of virus.
They are not going to blend together
and create one magic flu coronavirus virus.
That is not going to happen.
It's virologically not possible.
So that is not going to happen.
But what may well happen,
what I believe is going to happen is that flu is,
flu is flu, flu is simply going to rear its head again.
And they're going to start labelling it as flu
because it's time for them
for the coronavirus story to disappear.
They've done the vaccines.
They're not going to be able to successfully
get the fourth booster pushed over everybody,
although they're trying,
but they've basically done their run of those vaccines.
So what they've got to do
is get a new round of vaccines through.
So what always happens in the industry,
and bear in mind,
I've been in this industry for a long time
and I've watched this pattern many times over.
Before they are about to introduce a new vaccine,
they always preempt it with several months
of campaigning in the media saying,
oh dear, we've suddenly got cases of.
So what are the new things they're talking about?
They've got cases of?
Hands up someone.
What are the new things they're talking about?
Japanese encephalitis?
Yep.
Japanese encephalitis.
So watch, there's going to be a new vaccine
coming out for Japanese encephalitis in the next few months.
They're starting to talk again about the flu.
What's the new flu vaccine they're going out?
Well, they are already developing an mRNA flu vaccine.
Moderna are developing an mRNA flu vaccine.
Same technology as the current COVID vaccines,
but a flu vaccine.
Novavax are developing a combined coronavirus flu vaccine.
So that's the new thing that they're going to start pushing.
So watch for it, be aware.
That's what it is.
It's developing a media campaign to tell people
this is what's coming, you need to be scared of it,
and this is what you need to do for it.
While they push in more of the technology
and more of all the things that I spoke about
when I spoke about the vaccines,
the issue around the mRNA,
the issues around graphene oxide,
the issues around the synthetic lipid nanoparticles,
all of that is coming in the next round of vaccines
that they're trying to get people scared enough to take.
So, flu and pneumonia.
Nothing new about it, always been around.
They're just trying to ramp it up again
so they can justify and get people scared enough
into another round of vaccines.
And of course, and the other thing that was very apparent,
it's for those who haven't heard,
I do touch on this in my videos,
but we do know that there's been a lot of research
and I do touch on this in my videos,
but we do now have evidence coming out
from insurance companies of absolute increased mortality.
Third quarter of last year,
we've got several different insurance companies
around the globe now
talking about a spike in total mortality, increased claims.
One company has got claims up 258%,
two and a half times total mortality claims.
Another company is saying 40%.
So the data is starting to come out.
The ABS statistics on total mortality
finished on November 21st.
So we haven't got fully to the end of the year,
but even so an analysis of the Australian ABS stats
shows an upkick.
Starting to, a slight hint of increased total mortality
across all of 221, but an upkick in November.
So more data as it comes out,
we'll demonstrate, you know, make this more clear.
So things are beginning to become apparent.
And so total mortality is very different
to COVID mortality, right?
This total mortality increase is not due to increase COVID.
It's other causes.
So this is what's happening.
So quick update.
So that's kind of part of where my attention's been going
in these last couple of weeks.
So I haven't forgotten things.
I've just had to divert a bit of attention
to getting some other things under the, you know,
under the belt.
So I think, yeah.
So questions, I think I'm open to questions.
So questions, I think, I think I'm open now
for people to ask me things.
Let's see where this goes.
No questions.
That's, that's.
Yeah, Robin, I put it in the chat that last Thursday
I woke up with a very, very scratchy throat,
couldn't speak, headache, but no fever, no nothing,
no cough, and, and that was it.
And I was wondering what, what it was, you know?
Yeah.
The point is, people have been forgetting
that we are surrounded by respiratory viruses
and there's hundreds of these, these critters.
You know, we've got lots of respiratory viruses.
And in fact, in our, in our category of flu-like viruses,
there are several.
There is influenza, there's, there's para-influenza.
You know, we've, so we've got these,
all these different groups.
What was interesting when they first ran out,
they, and this was done in military,
the military study where they looked at doing,
giving flu vaccines to the military,
they found that the giving of the flu vaccines
actually increased the incidence of these other non-flu,
but cause flu symptom viruses.
And there, and there are heaps of them, right?
So we really, the only reason we hear about the flu so much
is because that's one they can, they routinely measure,
they have vaccines against them.
And so this is really what we've got to bear in mind,
that we really only hear about the things
that it's worth their time to document
because they've got vaccines against them.
The other big one is called the metamneumonia viruses, right?
And that's actually a big cause of stuff,
but you don't ever hear about those.
No?
So, so you could have had any,
any one of a number of viruses, one of a number.
The good thing is,
and I'll, my grand cycle, we'll go into this.
So, so the good thing is that
if your mucosal immunity is working well,
in a sense, it doesn't matter what your body gets exposed to
because your first line of defences can shield it off.
The thing about being, if our mucosal immunity is down
and something gets into our system,
it's just a problem with our vaccines,
it shuts off mucosal immunity.
There is a four-day lag
between when something first hits our system
and our body is making antibodies to it.
And so that's why I talk so much
about getting the mucosal immunity working
and getting the natural immunity working well,
because you lose four days
until the rest of the immune system can kick in
and can actually start to fight infection.
So this is where we're back to the whole thing
of getting background health good,
of having the right bacteria sort of in your system,
feeding yourself the right foods.
These are all important for your mucosal immunity.
Things like colostrum is very good
for your mucosal immunity.
Vitamin A is very important here.
Vitamin D, all of those things
that are important for your immune system.
I've spoken of. So, so yes, some mucosal immunity and in terms of managing any of that. So again,
going back to the things that I've said in my first ones, and the lists are coming together
again, I'm needing to do international level lectures on all this. So the process of pulling
it together for the lectures means it'll also get pulled together for you guys.
So, yeah, for the for the vitamins and so on. So, so yeah, Catherine, it's, it's really more
about, I haven't been able to put the pen to paper to pull the rest of that together,
because I keep being diverted by all these other things that other people want me to do.
So I'm trying to make things gel together. And then when that does come out, you will get very
complete lists of things. So I might while we're sort of talking around the COVID and the vaccine
thing, I might talk into Teresa's question around the Novavax. So Novavax isn't operating as gene
therapy, fortunately. We don't have any evidence, well, not directly, I'll put this another way.
The Novavax is giving you the spike protein, and a bigger dose probably than you would have
if you caught the SARS-CoV-2. So it is giving you the spike protein. Now, we do have evidence that
the spike protein itself will get into the nucleus and will disrupt our genetic repair
processes in the DNA. So yes, the spike protein in that sense is gene therapy in the sense that
spike protein can get into the nucleus and can disrupt our DNA repair mechanisms.
But it's not gene therapy in the sense that it isn't being given by way of a messenger RNA that
gives a message to our DNA for our DNA. Well, a message to the RNA that can go back into the DNA
that tells us to make the spike protein. So the Novavax isn't telling us to make the spike protein,
it's giving us a dose of the spike protein. So it's a little better. Having said that,
we are already seeing side effects coming out with Novavax. So it is still not,
not, I'm not comfortable with it. I'm still not comfortable with it. So,
and production, look, with all most of these, there is at some point in the production that
fetal cell lines have been used, even if not quite directly. Novavax is being,
theory is we are told, being made in moth cells. So we're getting moth cell lines being used for
the production of the spike protein. The synthetic lipid nanoparticles, so that's synthetic.
And certainly in Australia, we're not allowed any religious reasons whatsoever. Religious
exemptions do not apply in Australia. Virtually no exemptions apply in Australia. Close to none.
So, so yeah, so that, that's Novavax. So, so back to your, so basically if you, acute illnesses,
and this, this pattern, this protocol for acute illnesses will apply whether it's COVID,
whether it's flu, whether it's a virus, whatever it is you're coming down with.
If you straight away go into, so that background drink that I've told you about, you'll remember
that drink where you take your whole lemon, your garlic, your knobs of root ginger, you blend all
that up, that background drink. So you straight away use that as a tea. Okay. And if you happen
to be growing sage or thyme or anything else like that in your garden, you can throw that in for
good measure. Any one of those antimicrobial herbs, holy, holy basil, Tulsi basil, any one of those.
So that becomes your baseline. And then straight away. So most people, when they're
treating a virus and what have you, don't, you know, think, oh, they'll say, yeah, I'm taking
some vitamin C. Well, how much? Oh, once or twice a day. No. If you want to be serious about nailing
an acute infection, that has to become your focus for a couple of days. It's not a, maybe I'll take
some other things. It's like, well, no, four times a day. And depending on what it is you have on hand
to treat, what your actual armamentarian is. But if you've got vitamin C, a mixed mineral
bicarbonate, vitamin C powder with other good stuff in it. So we've got one of those at the
center. There are quite a few of those available. A teaspoon of that four times a day. We want to
go high dose. And in fact, if we really want to be serious about it, the next level of vitamin C
again, is what we call bowel tolerance. So this is where you take a teaspoon every hour.
until your gut starts to get loose and rumbly. Now that's not a toxin effect. That's not toxicity.
What it is instead is the gut saying, I can no longer absorb extra vitamin C because my
white cells are already loaded. So the vitamin C gets concentrated into our white blood cells.
And when our white blood cells have enough vitamin C, they produce what's called the
peroxide burst. We actually make hydrogen peroxide in our own bodies, in our white blood cells.
So when the white blood cells are sufficiently loaded with vitamin C,
they put a dump of hydrogen peroxide out onto the critters that they're trying to kill.
So we don't need to take hydrogen peroxide, we just load up our white blood cells.
So you take one teaspoon of vitamin C every hour until the gut's on the verge of being
loose. Then you drop it back to second hourly, same deal. Then drop it back to third hourly.
Then drop it back to fourth hourly. Now, if we're fighting a serious infection,
this is threatening to be a bacterial pneumonia, for example, then you might need to be sitting
on the high dose vitamin C for a couple of days before you get to bowel tolerance.
Because what we know is that in an acute illness situation, the human body can require up to now
get ready for this concept of dosing because it'll blow your mind up to 100 grams of vitamin C in a
day if we're fighting serious infection, 100 grams, a teaspoon, three grams, or thereabouts.
So if we're fighting serious high dose infection, the body's need can be really high.
So humans don't make vitamin C, that's our problem, we can't make it.
So what's a good analogy? So body-wise, size-wise, we're similar to, let's say a goat. A stressed
goat will make 20 grams of vitamin C, easy. Its adrenal glands makes vitamin C. So 20 grams,
seven teaspoons, let's say. So that's a stressed goat, but we can't make that.
So we are dependent on external sources for our vitamin C. So if historically in the Garden of
Eden where fruit was laden and stuff was laden with everything, that wasn't a problem, that's
fine. But now we can't do that. So if we're acutely, severely stressed, if we've got a
severe infection, then load up on vitamin C and your body will tell you how much it wants.
So we start off hourly, then we can drop back to second hourly, drop back to third hourly,
drop back to fourth hourly. Once we've got to fourth hourly, you drop back to four times a
day and you would basically sit on that until you're well. And if you've nailed something early,
that might take a day or two days. If you've let it sit for a while and it's serious infection,
then that might take a bit longer, but really you've got to dose according to the body's need.
But certainly a little tickle of a one 500 milligram vitamin C tablet twice a day,
that's not going to do very much in the context of a body's need of 20, 30 grams or more.
Okay. Does that make sense? So if we're going to use vitamin C, let's use it to a proper level.
Your other alternative with vitamin C is to use what's called liposomal C.
So your difference with liposomal, and you might've heard this term,
there's a lot of supplements now that are done liposomally. So your difference with liposomes
is what they've done is the substances have been contained in an envelope of very particular types
of fats called phospholipids. So these phospholipids are similar to the lipids we have in our cell
membranes. So it's like the body recognizes this and the cell membranes recognize that and want to
gobble it up because they want the phospholipids that are containing the substance. So the body
will suck it up so it can get the phospholipids and that then releases the substance into your
system. So you can get liposomal vitamin C depending on which form it is you've got.
I personally prefer the sachet forms. One sachet of that liposomal C is said to be the equivalent
of a three gram IV dose. Now, whether it's quite that good, I'm not sure, maybe not quite that good,
but certainly because it bypasses its dependence on gut absorption to a large degree, it is more
like an IV dose. So it's not a bad idea to keep some liposomal C on hand in case you are
fighting something a bit more severe and you just can't manage the gut dosing. And of course,
the super duper way to get vitamin C is intravenous.
everyone's got access to that. And that's another level, you know, again, you can fight incredible
diseases with intravenous vitamin C. They are currently, finally, thank goodness, doing trials
on intravenous vitamin C in ICU for sepsis, finally. But certainly myself, intravenous vitamin
C has literally saved my life twice, literally. So I know very well the value, the effect of it,
the value of it, twice when I should have died, IBC saved me. So it's seriously good stuff.
So vitamin C. Somebody threw something in there?
No? Okay. So back to your acute stuff. So you've got your drink going, you've got some vitamin C,
so zinc is, you know, the next port de corps, get some probably 20 milligrams zinc tablets,
and you can have that four times a day for a few days. So again, short term high dosing is fine,
short term. So you can take yourself quite a bit beyond what what a label or something would say
if you are only doing it for one or two days, short term high dosing is fine. You can't do
long term high dosing. Right? Yeah, vitamin C is what for those of us who do integrative medicine
and cancer treatment, IV vitamin C is one of the cornerstones of integrative treatment for cancer.
integrative management, I'm not allowed to use the word treatment, integrative management.
So I'm not allowed to treat anything anymore. So because I'm no longer a doctor. So
yeah, get the medicine chest ready for winter. Exactly. That's the thing to do you have your
things on hand, and hopefully, then you're not going to need them, but you have them on hand.
So the first sign of a something you you take something, and there's so many ways we can do it,
we can do it with your vitamins, you can do it with herbs. So I love herbs, herbs, to me, you
know, my favorite things, really. So it's really good to one hand a herbal combination. And there
are again, many herbs that are very effective in your first thing of trying of treating infections.
Andrographis is a really good one. echinacea is a really good one. elderberry is a really good one.
So they'd probably be the first top three, you know, that I would say, and there are lots of
lots of others. Again, you know, it from our center, we've got a blend where we've got all
those pre made and others pre made, which just called the antiviral mix. And so I suggest for
my patients that they clients, I can't say patients anymore, I've got to get used to this, haven't I?
Yeah, it's crazy that they keep a bottle of this on hand. So it's good just to have a bottle on
hand, a bottle of something like that on hand. And then you can reach for it if you are getting
sick in a couple of doses, and you're fine. So your herbs, your vitamin C, your zinc,
and your background drink, and that will do you don't try if you're fighting an acute infection,
don't try to be eating big meals, the body needs to be able to put its focus across to fighting the
infection. This is another thing where a lot of people go wrong, I think, Oh, dear, I don't feel
like eating, I've got to force myself to eat. I don't don't worry about that for a day or two.
Just don't worry, water fasting, better way to go, let the body put its focus on clearing the
infection. When you start to naturally feel an appetite back here. So then you start again,
but not initially. And the other old fashioned thing to go to straight up is the the old the
old fashioned letting someone fever something through and we can actually promote the body,
there are herbs that are what we call fibrofusers, we can actually promote the body doing a heat up.
So because the heating of the body actually switches on the immune system. So here we are
frantically telling everyone thinks they've got as soon as I start to get a fever, they've got
to take a panadol. That's exactly the wrong thing to do. On two counts. One, you switched off your
fever, which your body needs to activate your immune system. And two, you've just given yourself
a substance which depletes the body of N-acetyl cysteine, which the body needs to make glutathione.
glutathione is a really important natural molecule our body makes, that we need to activate our
cell mediated immunity, mucosal first line immunity, and we need as an antioxidant and
we need as a detoxifier. So you don't want to be giving yourself anything that depletes N-ac.
So don't use paracetamol. In my books, the only place for and I would be doing aspirin or
norepinephrine is if you've got a pounding headache. If your head is exploding, because
we do want to shut down head inflammation, we don't want head inflammation. So if you've got
a pounding headache, sure, aspirin.
So Yolanda, you've got a great combination there.
Go-to cola and Brahmi are great for the brain.
Vietnamese mint, you can probably use that
as a general support thing.
Purple sage, sages are wonderful as both antioxidant,
good for the brain and antibacterial.
So you've got a good selection there.
How to make collard oil taste better?
That's a really good question.
Collard oil is collard oil.
There are capsules available,
so you can bypass the taste by taking it in capsule form.
You can educate yourself to cope with the plain cod roe oil taste.
Or Carlsons, which is an Antarctic cod roe oil,
which my two favourite brands
have put together flavoured versions for kids.
So they've got a lemon-flavoured one and a peach-flavoured one
to make them more palatable.
They've got strawberry-flavoured little gummies, more palatable.
And actually, a lot of my kids
actually rather like the little strawberry gummies.
They'll actually take them as sweets.
So it is possible.
But yeah, cod roe oil is a brilliant food.
Everyone should be having cod roe oil.
Yeah, yeah.
OK.
So you're feeling armed then?
That kind of gives you all a sense of some stuff you can do.
Yeah?
Oh, I started back on the heating.
So don't switch off a fever.
Instead, promote yourself getting hot.
So even going and having a super hot shower or a hot bath.
Because we actually want to activate your body heat
and allow yourself to sweat out the infection.
Alternating hot and cold's even better.
Do your super hot bath and then a really quick cold shower.
Just quick, light, not too long.
I actually had the opportunity to have to test this.
Inadvertently, it wasn't a deliberate clinical test,
but it just happened that it was.
I was coming down with a virus just exactly at the time,
on my last trip down to Sydney,
just exactly at the time I was booked in to have a hot.
My daughter, for a birthday present,
had booked me in to have a hot salt float bath
followed by a steam room thing.
I'd never done one of those before.
And so I was booked in and I thought,
I don't care that I'm getting sick.
I'm going to go do this and it should help me.
And I was trying hard to make sure
that they didn't see that my nose was running
or that I was feeling sniffly
or that I really wasn't feeling very well.
So anyway, went through that.
By the time I'd finished the hot soaking,
the hot salt soaking, and then the really,
and what I did with the steam baths was I let it stay.
You're in a steam room.
So I got super heated and then each gap they had,
I jumped under the cold shower and quickly cooled it down,
then had another round.
And I think it was three or four goes of that.
So by the time all that had finished,
so the whole process was, I think an hour,
an hour and a half, maybe from memory,
the virus was completely gone.
I was completely well.
So old fashioned therapy.
Yeah, chili is one of the heating things.
You can certainly throw some chili.
Cayenne will also heat,
but chili will certainly do it into the, and hot drinks.
That's part of why we want this drink to be a hot drink,
not cold drinks.
You don't actually,
you actually don't want to be doing things to cool you
until you've successfully gone hot, right?
You've got to successfully go hot first.
Yeah.
All right, back to, so Virginia,
question of migraines, hereditary migraines.
This is where we get a combination of a genetic tendency
that then will get triggered by stuff in the environment.
So what we know from,
and really a great deal of research around it.
So basically a migraine is almost at that time,
it's like a short circuiting
in the mitochondria in the brain.
So there is a problem with energy function
in the brain at that time.
And depending on what type of migraine you get,
the people who get your classic migraine
with the aura and the visual stuff,
what they've actually got happening in addition to that,
we now know is actually some microspasm
that can result in microclotting.
Like a temporary mini stroke.
So we actually need, yeah, Kerry's now muted, great.
And actually, you know, like a mini stroke.
So what we need to do for that pattern of migraines
is you need to get onto circulation herbs.
And this is where your classic one is ginkgo.
So ginkgo has been proven beneficial for your migraines.
You want to be on CoQ10
because CoQ10 is protecting your mitochondria
and you want to be on B2.
B2, and this is a particular mitochondrial nutrient at some stage later as I talk through
things I can show where in the mitochondrial pathway that works, but it's been shown to be
particularly helpful for your migraines. So in that family of migraines, aside from being careful
with your red wine, your amine foods, so red wine and cheese are your two big ones in that group.
So be careful with those and your sulfite preservatives. Be careful with all of those,
but let's come to protecting your brain. So ginkgo, B2 and CoQ10. And there are some other
herbs that are really good and being worked out there as well alongside the ginkgo feverfew.
There's another herb butterbur. So again, we've made up a migraine herb mix that we've got at
the center. But yeah, so all of those things are things that's worth getting onto to prevent,
protect. It's a genetic point of weakness that your system's got. You've now got to protect it.
How hot do you need to get? And is there a temp that's too hot? Well, that's a good question.
Well, certainly you don't want to burn your skin. So you want to be hot enough that it certainly,
you feel your body warming up, but you don't want it so hot that it's painful on your skin,
because then you're causing yourself a skin damage. It's causing you a bit of trauma. So
you certainly want it, and not a tepid bath. There's got to be a warm to hot bath.
So, well, a thermometer temp, that actually varies a bit for each person's individual
capacity. Some people can take hotter than others. So I'd be very hesitant to actually
tell what thermometer temp. But it's useless having it, if you're measuring thermometer
temp, it's useless having it at a temp that's too close to 37 degrees.
No, what I'm meaning is when you take your temperature,
how hot is too hot? Like 42 degrees, 43 degrees, 44 degrees? What temperature would you go,
oh, that's a bit too hot. I should do something to bring it down.
People aren't going to make it to 44 degrees. So that's hypothermia. So yes, hypothermia really
would be an issue. No, I'm meaning Celsius.
Let me finish. People are tending to jump on a 39 degree temp and say, oh dear, that's terrible,
I've got to bring that down. No, the brain is not going to start showing signs of delirium
and overheating until we're around 42. So in little kids, we talk about the febrile seizures,
and everyone freaks about the fevers, and we've got to give them Panadol. Well, actually, it's
not the peak of the temp that's the issue, it's the rapid rise in temp. So by the time you're
worried about the temp, they've already done the rapid rise. And again, in that context,
paracetamol is not helpful because it's taking away their glutathione, so that's not the way to
do it there. So really, you do want to allow your temp. Think of all those old movies that we've all
watched where in the movie, the hero or the whoever has got sick through the day, and here
they are fevering through the night, everyone's hanging around and hanging around, are they going
to make it? Are they going to make it? And what happens is the fever peaks, and then everyone goes,
oh, it's broken. What's happened there? What's happened there is that they fevered enough to
activate their immune system enough that they have caught the infection, and now they don't need that
fever. So what happens? Did they turn it off by pouring cold water on them or giving them some
paracetamol or aspirin? No, the body said, I don't need to fever now. I've done it.
So we've got to stop being scared of fever. We need to fever.
If a body is in a state of prolonged and very high fevers, that it's not so much
of the fever is the problem. It tells us there's something else going on here. We need to look at,
well, what's driving this fever? Why has the body not successfully been able to bring the fever up,
get it to break, and then drop? Why haven't we beat what's going on? What is going on?
Okay. No, you mustn't give in to paracetamol for your daughter if she's got a temp. She's got to
be allowed to fever it through. And paracetamol, yeah, we've got other studies that show that
giving paracetamol actually prolongs the duration of a fever. So whereas instead of allowing the
body to get to a fever point, so it actually achieves what it needs to do and then breaks
the fever, we give paracetamol, which means the body only kind of gets to here and the body's
still saying, sorry, prolongs the duration of the illness. The body kind of gets to here and then
but I haven't
Finish the job.
This infection's still here.
So it keeps trying to fever.
You keep suppressing it with the paracetamol.
It keeps trying to fever.
You keep suppressing it with the paracetamol.
Don't be afraid of fever.
Okay.
Does that kind of feel better, everyone?
Shannie, are you feeling better on that?
Okay.
Good, good.
Could I ask a question regarding fever?
Yeah, yeah.
Hi, Lida.
Hi.
So often, you know,
obviously we've been taught all the wrong things
because as soon as the fever gets to 38 degrees,
especially in children, we're told to take Panadol.
But what I experienced personally is that when,
you know, like I haven't been sick for a long time,
but I remember when I did, and I do have fever,
I start to feel really, really cold instead of hot.
So in that sense, like you get warm to a certain,
I guess to a certain temperature,
and then your hands start to get cold
and your feet start to get cold in that feverish moment.
And that's when you think, okay, I need to take Panadol now
because my body can't handle this cold.
So you just live through that?
No, you see what's happened there is your body is saying,
I am trying to generate a fever,
but I haven't got enough heat in my body to do it.
How can I get more heat in my body to generate a fever?
I'll pull my circulation into my core.
So there's not so much lift in your hands and your feet.
What you need to do instead is rug yourself up
so that you are warm and your hands and feet are warm
so the body can actually successfully generate the fever.
It needs to be a fever and sweat
to get the system activated to get the infection out.
Excellent, thank you.
Sort of reading what the body's doing.
So what's the body done here?
It's pulled the circulation away from your periphery.
If your hands and feet have gone cold,
it's because the body said,
I'm not putting circulation out there.
Why not?
It's trying to generate the fever.
It's trying to pull the circulation into the core.
So you give it more warmth so it doesn't have to constrict
and pull the circulation away.
Yep.
Okay.
Yeah, I've got another question, sorry.
Regarding vitamin C.
Go on.
So with vitamin C, you were referring to powder form.
Now, is there only one type of powder form for vitamin C?
Like if I just go to a chemical?
There are multiple.
So the cheapest form of vitamin C is the pure ascorbic acid.
That's your cheapest form.
That's your pure synthetic form.
Very acidic.
I don't recommend anyone use ascorbic acid.
It's too acidic.
Then your next grades up are the mineral ascorbates.
And the first one is sodium ascorbate.
But then you can also get calcium ascorbate,
magnesium ascorbate.
So your better vitamin Cs are the ones
that have got a mix of those mineral ascorbates,
but have also got,
because vitamin C in nature doesn't occur
as ascorbic acid or as ascorbate.
It occurs as a crystalline structure
that's got the bioflavonoids around it protecting it.
So what are the bioflavonoids?
These are the things that we find
in the pith of vegetables.
So this is your root and your hysperid
and your quercetin that everyone is suddenly hearing about.
Most people never knew before COVID came along
what the heck quercetin was.
They'd never heard of it.
Now everyone knows quercetin.
Yeah.
So what's quercetin?
It's a bioflavonoid that occurs naturally
as one of these things that accompany vitamin C.
So your better vitamin C powders
have got your mixed mineral ascorbates
along with some zinc and along with some bioflavonoids.
They're the better ones.
So then if we were to go and purchase that,
is there a brand or is there a place that stock?
What do you recommend?
Yeah, I've got to be careful on talking brands.
You can't really do that,
but good health food shops would have one
and we've got the good ones at our center as well.
So I think Elise has sent through the center details
for stuff, but yeah, there are lots of different,
there are quite a lot of good brands out there.
Now, are you talking vitamin C, sodium ascorbate?
Is that what I've got?
Yeah.
that's that's your midline. Yeah, that's what I said. That's
kind of like your middle of the range ones, your better ones
are not just sodium ascorbate. There's sodium ascorbate and
calcium ascorbate and magnesium ascorbate and they've got zinc
and biflavonoids with them as well. So that's one step.
That's one step better than the ascorbic acid.
All right.
Okay. So because I've got this, I've got this and another half
of this. So if I'm taking this, do I take a double dose of of
this thing?
You just need to take with it, make sure that with it, you've
got extra zinc and you've got some biflavonoid sources.
Okay, so I'm already I already take zinc.
Yeah, so you're kind of partway there. I'd still you'd still
want biflavonoid sources. We're in the process of setting up a
website and on the website, I will be putting some selected
whole food type supplements that they're not synthetic, but
they're whole food based things that will work very well
alongside stuff like that. So that's in the process of all
being set up. So it'll be there, there before winter, there in
the next couple of weeks, we hope everything always takes
longer than you think. But anyway, yep. So you're partway
there. Yeah. Basically, you know, the closer we can get with
anything we have, the closer we can get to the forms it occurs
in naturally, then then the better it's going to work in our
system, because that's how God designed us, you know. So so
it's like the closer we get to the forms that are that are
naturally there, then the better it is. Yeah, we think
about when we isolate and synthesize, but as soon as we
start to do that, we miss some of the effects or we create
imbalances. Yeah, well, I am having that drink that you you
talked about with the lemon and the garlic and the ginger. And I
have fresh turmeric as well, which I chuck in. Good. So I've
been having that every day. But why?
All right, good. How long have you been doing that for now? A
couple of weeks? Oh, yeah. Yeah. Are you noticing anything yet? I
am. In fact, I think my energy levels are better than they were.
I'm still my energy levels are still not fresh hot. And some
days I'm really, I'm really struggling. So yeah.
Good. That's, that's a good start. So Shani, I think I need
to answer that. I think I know I need to know a little bit more
about what's going on for your for your daughter. And there is
not no specific contra indication I am aware of for
cosetum here. So what's your back your daughter's background
situation?
So she's got Rett syndrome and epilepsy. And we had an
appointment yesterday with a neurologist and I asked him
about the cosetum and he just googled it and said that because
two of her drugs metabolized by the liver, the cosetum could
affect how the liver does that. But if you're going to say that
that's not a problem, I will keep her on it.
Love it. This is one of the biggest cop outs of the medical
system for saying you can't use any nutritional supplement,
because virtually all your decent herbs and decent
nutritional supplements will improve liver function. The
bottom line is the body wants to detoxify. As far as the body's
concerned, those anti epileptic drugs, she's been given a
toxins, and the body wants to detoxify them. Right? You do
what you can to stop the body detoxifying those drugs, you're
also stopping the body detoxifying and dealing with
everything else that needs to deal with.
Yeah, because I think I think the thing is, is that if the
liver is functioning better than it makes the drugs more makes
them stronger, which could then potentially make them too strong
and cause side effects.
The obvious solution to that is to reduce the dose of the drugs.
Yeah, that would be what I would think too. And the less drug you
need to use, the better it's going to be.
Absolutely. So what you do is you improve her
function overall as best you can. I treat Gretz syndrome a lot of the time, there still comes to
the underlying question that those drugs are not improving her neurology, all they're doing is
blocking. They're not improving the underlying process. So, you know, so do everything you can
for her background health, which will reduce the need for the drugs and reduce the dosage of drugs
that she is needing. Yeah, and that's really come from this concept of what's the body trying to do
the body is trying to optimise its own function. It is trying to detoxify what it regards correctly
as toxins. They are toxins. Yeah, I mean, ideally, I'd like to be able to eliminate them.
Sorry, what you need is to find someone, what you need is to find someone who understands both
biochemistry, pharmacology, and what's going on the process of Rett syndrome, what's going on in
her brain, and then they can guide you through that, so that you actually improve the underlying
brain function, so there is less need for the medication. And where do I find somebody like that?
I'm not allowed to make any recommendations. Let's just say that, that this is the sort of
the point on this is the sort of thing that I was known internationally for was I introduced
biomedical treatment of this group of children into Australia. So there are groups, there's an
organisation called Mind Foundation in Australia, the Mind Foundation has got a list of practitioners
who've got varying degrees of expertise in the area of being able to treat these children.
I need someone in New Zealand.
Yeah, you know, the Mind Foundation has got connections into New Zealand.
You don't need someone in New Zealand.
A lot of it can be done via Zoom. So you don't necessarily need someone in New Zealand.
But there are some good integrative doctors in New Zealand who know this sort of work.
So do some hunting around. But yes, you know, really understand that as far as the body's
concerned, the drugs and the bottom line is they are, they are toxins, they're blocking pathways,
they are not enhancing or improving the background function. And the body sees them as toxins and
wants to get rid of them. And they make it quite sleepy too. Yeah, they're sedated. That's how they
work. You know, so, so, you know, it's a question of looking at what's actually going on in her
biochemistry, what's actually going on in the brain function in the brain tissue, she'll have
chronic activation of what's called the microglia in the brain. And the microglia are the basket
cells that hold the neurons in the brain, we used to think they were just basket cells. But now we
know they're immunologically completely active. And so what happens is the body immunology gets
switched on by something, it sends signals into the brain, the brain immunology gets switched on.
So these microglial cells got switched on ages ago when she flipped into RETs.
And they haven't switched off. So the brain is being chronically irritated and inflamed.
And that's why she's getting seizures. So the drugs are all working to block,
they're not in any way improving or healing that underlying process.
Now, yeah, I'm aware of that. Yeah. Yeah, yeah. Yeah. So I had something I was something else
I was going, oh, that's right. So giving supplements, and the pharmaceuticals, should they be done
apart from each other? Or is it okay to do them together at the same time?
Yeah, that's a good question. Probably not a bad idea to do them apart. So the body can actually,
instead of at the same time as trying to deal with the process of detoxifying the stuff that's just
come in, it can actually be incorporating the nutrients into the metabolism and into the
function, and then deal with the drugs. Probably not a bad idea to be separating them.
So should the supplements, should she have food with the supplements,
or can they be given on their own?
Generally, I take the view that supplements are, as it were, superfood. Okay, super ramped up
to the body is not going to switch on all its proper digestive processes. If you just follow
a couple of pills, it won't. Whereas if you put the supplements with food, the same time as food,
the body is already activating all the digestive processes and the digestive enzymes to be able to
metabolize that food. So it's going to make better use of your supplements.
Yeah, because I normally put her supplements in with a smoothie that I make for her for breakfast.
um but then after she's finished her after she's had her breakfast she then has her medications
yeah that's that's probably okay the supplements have gone in sort of separately yeah right yep
yeah she has a mickey button so i can chuck all sorts in her smoothie that she doesn't have it
doesn't have to taste good so when did when did she need that put in
um that was put in when she was seven so about uh 10 years ago
so when did she flip in or become a parent that she had rats when she was
around about a year coming up to a year
right so she still ate right she still eats but um i we have it for um fluids because
she has issues with swallowing um fluids she aspirates on them um and
yeah she she lost two kilos back when she was seven she went from like 15 kilos down to 13
and um yeah that was too much weight so she was put in so that we could give her overnight feeds
to give her extra calories but it only took six months to get her weight back up and i haven't
needed to use it for extra calories but yeah i just do a smoothie through it um because then i
can get lots of good stuff into her that i couldn't otherwise so rett syndrome is the classic example
of what over time you guys will hear me talking an awful lot more about and that is that we have
a genetic predisposition we all have genetic predisposition then and that'll be a familial
component that can pass through and as i say to all my now clients the genes give you the ballpark
within which you're going to play but which end of that ballpark you're going to play you can
totally determine which end of the ballpark you're going to get you're going to play will will be
determined by what we call epigenetic factors things that operate on the genes and operate
around the genes so rett syndrome is one of these things that parents like you shani are basically
being told to look it's all a genetic syndrome there's nothing you can do i'm sorry but that's
absolute garbage there is a strong genetic predisposition in rett syndrome that gets
activated and because it gets activated by these other epigenetic effects then she runs down as
your daughter did you run down this pathway of biochemical metabolic immunological dysfunction
that manifests as a brain dysfunction that is a totally new description from everything i've been
taught so that's that's encouraging that there is some yeah stuff we can do about it absolutely
absolutely but you need someone who understands those concepts and how to measure it and how to
work into it to peel back the layers for so that because even when we get down to the actual
genetics and i first i first really you know god beat me over the head to get this i would
want to be 30 years ago now when a young man was brought in with and he had a triple triple three
things that we're told as doctors you can't change so he had down syndrome and he had autism and he
was 28 years old so you know right so so you could i heard him in the waiting room before he
came in all like all you could hear was loud single word loud yelling abuse stuff that's all
you could hear he was yelling he was off the planet so i came in couldn't sit down no sentences
just single word as i said loud yelling this was i said 30 years ago so i just did what i knew
as basics worked with them for six months did what i knew as just basics then at the time which
is nowhere near the level of of the awareness that we have now and the knowledge we have now
and they went away and i didn't see them for 12 months didn't hear or see anything other than
you think oh well then they came back 12 months later this time i didn't hear him in the waiting
room i didn't know he was coming in and he came in with his care and his mom walked in politely
i'm looking at him he sat down on the chair i'm going what's you know sat down quietly
and then this mom started to say i don't know what you've done but and it's like oh dear i'm
in trouble what have what have i done this time what had happened was
was in the space of that time, just on the baseline of what I've done, which, as I said,
is a fraction of what we know now. His behaviours are, oh, and what I should say in that yelling
and pacing, so he used to have night routines that would keep him up all night. He wouldn't
go to bed at night. He had severe obsessions, totally non-functional on a whole heap of
antipsychotic drugs, and so on. It was just totally non-functional. So what had happened
was he'd settled down. He started to spontaneously speak in sentences, spontaneous, no speech
therapy or anything intervention. The yelling and screaming stopped, settled. He came off
his antipsychotics. He had been working in a sheltered workshop, and where that was,
they had to change his position, his station, because his IQ function suddenly jumped. So
that made me stop and think. I had to go searching then. It's like, well, what have I done? How
the heck has this happened? I've got three things here. I'm told that we can't change.
We're told that once someone's an adult, you can't do anything about it. We're told that
Down syndrome is a genetic disorder that you can't do anything about. We're told that autism
is probably a genetic disorder. They like to say that you can't do anything about. He
was 28. What did you do? This is where there's levels to it, but it has all to do around
this question of epigenetics and how do we optimise body function. So we have to look
at diet. We have to look at what's going on in the gut. We have to get baseline supplements
that work into the biochemistry and stabilise the neurochemistry and so on. Now I know a
heck of a lot more. There's a massive number of layers to it. But the bottom line is there's
hope because it is not only a genetic disorder. It is a genetic disorder acted on by the epigenetics
and we can alter the epigenetics. We can totally alter the epigenetics.
And what we know from the work of people like Norman Deutsch and people like this, the brain
that changes itself, we know now from neuroplasticity and all this, what the scientists are doing is
that you can still always create new brain pathways. It actually is never too old. Sure,
it's a lot easier when kids are young because their brain patterns are forming. It is a lot
easier then. And once we hit the age of 12, we do prune a lot of pathways. That's all true.
But it's not fixed. The brain is still not fixed. We can change it.
Excellent. Okay. So go do some thinking and think about whether you want to push into that more.
And there are things that you can look at. Start off with the MIND Foundation,
M-I-N-D-O-D. Start off with the MIND Foundation and go from there.
Will do. Thank you very much. Yeah, I've been wanting to get her off the seizure meds.
We only went on them because she was having seizures every day.
And that started when she was five. She's been on them since she was five.
So what I'd like to... If I were talking to you more separately, I'd be wanting to have a very
detailed history of the exact timing of those, how those times... I assume she's been through
the routine vaccine schedule. No, no, no vaccines whatsoever. I'm anti.
No vaccines. No vaccines. I've had no vaccines. The only thing I've had is a tetanus once.
Okay. What I'd need to know then is your history because there's another toxic component that has
come in here that has activated her genetics. So I'd need to know where that is, where that's
come from. Probably mercury from my teeth.
I'm not sure whether there are any practitioners where you are that do oligoscans. Look up online
and see if there are any practitioners where you are that do oligoscans. If there are, get one done.
Okay. Okay. So what that is, it's a computerized, it's called tissue spectroscopy,
shines light into the tissues of the hand. And the pattern that comes back from that tells you
what vitamins and minerals are in the tissues of the hand. We don't have the Dr. Spock scanner,
you know, that scans the whole body and says there's this much in the brain. We don't have
that. But this can give a guide to what's going on in the tissues and you can at least treat that way.
Okay, cool.
So, Golia, we're kind of jumping around. So while I'm on this topic, thanks, Shani,
while I'm on this topic, I'll head to Elisa's question because really this is all related.
So what we're talking in all of these conditions, these are children's
neurodevelopmental behavioral disorders.
which are jumping dramatically in the last 20, 30 years,
these numbers have dramatically climbed
and we're seeing things that have never been seen before.
And it does correlate with the use in our environment
of increasing levels of glyphosate is a glyphosate
being put everywhere and interrupts magnesium pathways
and other things which are very much needed
for brain development.
A lot of mercury that has come through both maternal
and grandparent amalgams.
So that's kind of tracking generationally through.
We know mercury passes through the umbilical cord
into the uterus.
Studies that we've been doing of umbilical cord blood
has shown that newborn barbs have got over,
what was the last count?
I think it's 300 chemicals.
There's some phenomenal number of chemicals already
and toxins in the umbilical cord blood
before we add the rest of the load to them.
And then we have the modern vaccine schedule
which is taking the number of injections
being given to these children to never before levels.
So the load of toxin that these little developing brains
that are being exposed to is way beyond
what their systems can cope with.
So because the brains are developing,
that's where you get problems.
So yes, ADHD, oppositional defiant conduct disorder,
all of those are conditions where what we've got
is an underlying genetic predisposition.
And in each of those ADHD oppositional defiant conduct,
we're talking about the dopamine receptor system,
the dopamine four receptors.
And that's the part that's particularly affected
in those groups.
So in each of those groups,
we've got a genetic predisposition
that is then being acted on by what's happening
in our modern society.
So, and then it manifests as these abnormal behaviours.
So the behaviours aren't the problem,
they are the red flag telling you there's a problem.
But we treat the red flag instead of treating the problem.
So we measure them, we do whatever else we do to them
because we're worried about the symptom that's the problem
without looking at why is, what's going on?
What does that symptom mean?
What's it telling us about what's going on
in that child's body and that child's brain?
So as we go down the track, I could probably do,
well, I will be once we've gone through the Healthy 100,
I can do whole sessions into all of that.
It's that particular area is an area that I've known
that I've worked internationally in that particular area.
So the kids and neurodevelopmental disorders
is very much my thing.
So Jude, yes.
So now your challenge with having a 35 year old son
with Asperger's is he is his own adult.
So your question once they're adults is whether
until they are prepared to own it themselves
and wanna do something about it themselves,
you're not gonna be able to do it.
So that really becomes a question once they're adults,
whether it bugs them enough that they're prepared
to do something about it.
If not, you can't and you can't take over their lives.
So it's really only if they're gonna let you do that.
So that's where in a sense, Shani,
you've got the advantage, you're the feeder,
you're the everything, you can control what's going into it
until such time as she wakes up enough to start learning.
Cause having lost her at the age that you did,
she hasn't gone through the normal developmental stages.
So she hasn't gone through the normal developmental stage
of even finding her own boundaries.
So this is what happens for parents
as these kids do actually start to wake up
and get a degree of brain function.
They start having to test boundaries
except it's no longer in a two-year-old body.
Yeah, I'm actually being quite glad
that I haven't had those issues.
Yeah, it's cause you lost her too soon.
She hadn't got to that developmental stage.
But she has an eye gaze and she knows what's going on.
Yeah, she understands that kind of stuff.
Yeah, that's good.
But think through in terms of,
cause everything the body attracts is always in order.
It develops in order.
And so I think I was thinking through,
a bubby has got eye gaze from the word go,
but it's not and they're walking and moving
and feeding themselves and everything
long before they actually really start developing
this idea of personal identity.
Where's my personal identity and where do I end
and where does everything else begin?
And that's what testing boundaries is all about.
And that doesn't kick in until between two and three.
So yeah, anyway, wonderful, you've got room to go.
So, so shake, shake stuff.
it depends what's going in the shakes. So Kerry talking about substituting meals for
powdered shakes. Well, look, yes, you can do that. And for some people that'll kick
the system across. But the problem if you make your dependence on the idea that you
substituted two meals for powdered shakes is that you actually haven't learned how to
eat properly. So and the underlying cause for why the body has lost weight hasn't been
as gained weight hasn't been addressed. So, you know, yes, it can be good to have one
smoothie a day. I mean, you know, he's that's what this critter is, you know, but this isn't
a this isn't like a meal replacement. It's more that I tend to fast every morning. I
pretty much fast every morning through to lunchtime and some days on virtually continue
that fast, but instead I'll do it. So that's loaded with stuff from my garden, which is
why it's such a weird color stuff from my garden and berries and and then on in the
list of things that will be going on my website sort of thing. So those kind of powders and
that's that's what that is. So it's a super nutrition shake. It's not a synthetic. There's
nothing synthetic in that. It's all just pure superfood. So so be a little careful on on
just the concept of substituting meals for powdered shakes, you know, and smoothies unless
you really are both getting superfood into that. But you're also actually learning how
to eat good foods in the background. A better concept is to to get the body progressively
used to the idea. It just does not need as much food as we in the West think we need
to be eating. Yeah, exactly. Right. The body needs a bit of a break from eating. And so
this is where we come in. This is a whole separate question. But there are whole concepts
now developing around things like intermittent fasting, like what we call chronology eating.
This this idea that that really when you think through historically think through back to
your hunter gatherers, your primitive tribe hunter gatherers, there is no way they were
eating like from eight o'clock in the morning through to late o'clock at night. They were
out there. Well, it's okay. Now I've got to go milk the cows and all once I got to the
agricultural stage. So before that hunter gatherer now we're out going out trying to
chase the meat that we're going to be eating for the next day or two. You know, the women
are out there going and trying to dig to find the roots that we're going to be had. So they
didn't get to spend all day's eating. They would get go and work to gather the food and
yes, then there would be a feast. But that wasn't a daily or twice or three times a day
event. We've just got so society defeating our mouths from early in the morning to late
at night, the body isn't getting a break. And this is a large part of why we have this
problem called insulin resistance. What does insulin resistance mean? It means that our
cell membranes are saying I can't get the insulin into my cell to get the glucose from
the bloodstream into my cell to turn into energy. So where does that glucose come that
all that extra glucose that we've been eating, what's got to go somewhere, the body sticks
it across in the fat stores. So one of the first things we've got to do is to cut down
the timeframes that we're eating in and the actual volume of what we are eating, and then
make sure that everything of what we are eating is nutrition loaded. It's nutrient loaded,
not calorie loaded, nutrient loaded. And then you'll find the body doesn't actually want
to or need to eat as much, because it can make good use of what's coming in. And then
you get once the body's got you've got that happening, then you actually do get what we
call insulin sensitivity, which is that the cell receptors start to work again, because
they kind of say, Yeah, I want I want to get that nutrition in now. Thank you. That's,
that's good. So it's a whole heap of discussion, you know, and teaching around all of that.
But, but, but yes. Yeah, so so Shannie, I think Elisa's got anyway, I'll give it to
Elisa if she hasn't got it. But I think Elisa's got our center email. So orders at NBCC.net.au.
Or it's a Sydney number 0299133744. But Elisa has got that I'm sure, and can send those
to you. So yeah, good. So Lisa's put that put that up in the platform group there already.
So sorrel, lemon sorrel, look at like all of these, these vegetables, they've just got
a whole heap of good uses for the body. Virtually every one of these herbs when you go to look
them through have got a degree of antioxidant effect, a degree of liver support effect.
Your herbs and things are acting as signaling
molecules into the body.
No, sorrel is just another great one to have on hand.
As compared to lettuce, right?
So if you want, you know, everyone's used to saying,
oh, salad greens, I've gone and got some lettuce.
Well, look, iceberg lettuce is mostly water.
It's close to useless.
You know, if you are going to actually start
embarking on salads, do it with things like sorrel.
Do it with things like spinach's that you've grown
in your own backyard.
You know, do it with all of these other greens,
do it with kale and so on and so on.
Don't just think a salad is a bit of iceberg lettuce
that's got no nutrient value
and a greenhouse grown tomato
that also has no nutrient value.
Yeah.
So start eating real old fashioned greens.
They're a lot stronger in taste.
So you get used to that taste,
which you can then modify by putting a bit of olive oil on
and a bit of squeeze of lemon or lime juice.
So back to, okay.
So a couple of questions I kind of missed
on the way through.
I'll duck back into that.
High blood pressure.
Several, quite a lot of different things
around high blood pressure.
So I guess the first thing,
if you guys don't mind the dogs barking,
I'm going to open the door just because I need the air flow.
It's getting a bit stifling in here.
Hey, Gobi, stop it.
Okay.
So now you know I'm real.
We've got dogs in the background.
So as I was saying, high blood pressure.
Okay.
So what's it telling us?
It's telling us that our blood vessels
have got too much pressure in them.
So that's not usually because we've got too much blood.
So it's not usually because we've got too much blood
in our system.
It's usually because of issues to do
with the blood vessel walls or the heart function.
Now, if the blood vessel walls are too stiff,
the heart has to work harder
to try and get blood flow through.
And so there will be more pressure in the blood vessels
because the heart,
because the blood vessel walls are too stiff.
Now that's a common problem.
And that's happening in a,
and there are lots of ways you can measure that.
There are these tests, heart rate variability,
arterial stiffness.
There are a lot of different fancy tests
you can use to measure that.
A simple test that some doctors will do
is what they call ankle brachial index,
where they measure the blood pressure at your ankle
and compare it to the blood pressure in your arm
and look at that ratio.
And that gives us an idea of that stiffness.
So blood vessel walls will get stiff for various reasons.
So certainly inflammation can make them too stiff.
If there's issues around cholesterol getting,
this is where we get into
the whole cholesterol oxidized story.
If we've got lipids that have been oxidized
and calcified depositing in the blood vessel walls,
that'll make them stiff.
That's the disease atherosclerosis
or hardening of the arteries
where they literally get hard and stiff.
And ischemic heart disease in Australia
is still the number one killer.
Don't know about New Zealand,
but in Australia, it's the number one killer.
And of course we're seeing more,
it's no surprises in that we're seeing more people
having that effect as a side effect
of certain injections as well,
because it's a preexisting condition
that a lot of people have got.
So atherosclerosis, cholesterol getting oxidized,
coming into the blood vessel walls and calcifying.
So another thing that could be an issue here
is a particular hormone, endogenous hormone that we make
called nitric oxide.
And there is different types of nitric oxide.
There's endothelial nitric oxide,
which is the type we want in our blood vessel walls.
That will be reduced if we've got oxidative damage.
That'll be reduced if we've got inflammation.
And nitric oxide is the thing
that helps keep the blood vessel walls dilated.
So a whole heap of issues around the blood vessel walls.
A common correlation.
So high blood pressure commonly comes
in the triad of what we call metabolic syndrome.
So metabolic syndrome is where you've got a combination
of abdominal weight gain.
Well, often though, you won't see the weight gain,
but insulin resistance,
which will typically show as abdominal weight gain,
high blood lipids and typically cholesterol,
well, triglycerides there, but high blood lipids.
hypertension. So that's called metabolic syndrome. It's really where this insulin resistance that I
spoke of earlier is causing a shift in the metabolism so that the blood vessels have become
stiff. So that's an oxidative damage, insulin resistance problem.
Then there can be simple things around background stress. If we've got too much stress in the
system and the heart is pumping too hard, so we get excess catecholamines, stress hormones.
So the heart's pumping too hard, that can be linked with magnesium deficiency, calcium
deficiency, and indeed supplementing calcium and magnesium can often be enough to treat
blood pressure issues. So yeah, there are a whole heap of factors around it. But again, it's
genetic predisposition linked then with the stressors in the system that will make the
body manifest. It's both point of weakness, but way of coping. So often when the body is throwing
a symptom, it's the body's way of coping with whatever the problem is. And it's trying to say,
hey, I've got a problem. I'm trying to fix it. But it's really not working very well. Okay.
What can be an initial adaptive response, like it's appropriate to quickly whack up blood
pressure if you're in a situation of acute stress and you suddenly want to get blood
getting to all the organs so that you can do something. But if that mechanism stays in place,
then you actually get blood vessel damage happening in the back of the eyes,
happening in the kidneys, happening in all these other places, happening in the brain
as a result of the high blood pressure. Sorry, you go. Oh no, I was going to say,
this is for Hikara. We had a really bad thing when he got bitten by a black widow,
actually got bitten twice. But sometimes when he's doing hip cardio, his blood vessels go really
red. But when he has had it really bad, it's been like big stress factors. But even with doing the
hip cardio on the red blood vessels, is that really bad? Like when his eyes go red?
Yes, that would be a marker that he's got an acute hypertensive response. But also in
medicine, the liver opens to the eyes. So I'd be thinking we've got a background what we call
congestion in the liver, too much blood happening in the liver. So then under pressure, that'll
suddenly release up to the head and release up to the eyes. There's a few things I'd be suggesting
that he look around, you know, look around metabolic syndrome, look around what's happening
in the liver and look around, you know, stress responses. But yeah, if he's triggered by a
spider, so that would fit because that's a toxic response that could stress the liver.
Look at those other factors there as well. Yes, wonderful. Thank you.
Okay. And so shedding. Yes, look, the scientists have confirmed
that in your vaccinated people, and so far, it's only been measured, you know, we know, at least,
well, there's one mark that looks like it's four months, but at least 60 days afterwards,
the spike protein is excreted in what we call exosomes. So it's like the cells that have been
affected by the spike protein are trying to put this out both to get it out of those cells and to
message other cells to say, hey, this is what I'm dealing with. So what are exosomes? They're
they're lipid coated particles, and they stick the body sticks the spike protein on the outside of
them. So these do get excreted out of us being confirmed in scientific studies, we do we that
as you people have been vaccinated, of course, and people initially with COVID
do excrete exosomes with spike protein on them. So shedding is real.
As I said, we because all this whole process is new, and it takes a while to do studies and a
while to get them published. We really don't know exactly how long these effects go for,
right? We don't know. But we do know it has been confirmed in the short term, and it's real.
So so the other thing that is looking to be a concern as well, only very preliminary stuff on
this. So I can't say it's solid data. But it looks like the graphene oxide from the vaccines
might be being transmitted as well, which would make sense because the end that you might remember
from my lecture I did on the graphene oxide, that it's it's like nano particles, it's a single
molecular layer that cuts through tissue. So if it's able to cut through our tissue, I guess it
makes sense, doesn't it that it could escape from us to someone else. So, yeah, all of this stuff
still finding out about.
Yep, okay, anyone else? Have we got anything else for today?
Just on the graphene oxide, I saw a clip recently, I don't know whether it
is real or whether it's a hoax, but they reckon that the little writing on the
Nurofen Zavance tablets, that's got a little black writing on, that it's
graphene oxide. They dissolved these pills in a glass of water and then put a
magnet against it and all these little black bits were attracted to the magnet.
Our unfortunate reality is that graphene oxide is now being widely used in
industry, all industries, it's being used as a filler. So unfortunately graphene
oxide is being found in a lot of places, so that could well be true.
So they have confirmed graphene oxide in some of your nasal testing, they have
confirmed graphene oxide in some of the masks, but it is being used industrially
as a filler. So yep, so we come back to this thing of what I've said many times
here, which is that we have to do our best to stay away from anything man-made
synthetic and come back to real stuff, because they are using all sorts of
things in industrial processes.
Can't trust any of it.
I have to talk over the doggy. So when you were talking about the insulin
resistance, is that the cause of diabetes, diabetes 2?
So what happens is you have a spectrum. So it starts off where the body is saying
my cell receptors aren't working terribly well, and there can be several reasons for that,
but I cannot get this glucose properly into my cells. So that's the beginning of insulin
resistance. And again, there's several reasons around all of that. You might be deficient in
chromium, might be deficient in zinc, you might have too much omega-6 essential fats in your diet,
so the cell membranes are too stiff, might be eating too many carbs, so there's too much
glucose in the bloodstream, a whole heap of factors here, but whatever else is going on,
it starts with this insulin resistance. What the body then does is it's a bit like a squeaky lock,
it says, can't get the glucose into this cell, I'm going to keep trying, I'll keep trying harder,
so it makes more and more and more insulin. This insulin puts more and more and more glucose and
fat across into the fat stores, but the problem is the fat stores themselves are metabolically
active, they are creating more toxins, they actually promote insulin resistance and inflammation.
So this whole process keeps going. In the meantime, your pancreas, which is the organ that
has to be pumping out the insulin, is working harder and harder to try and pump out more insulin
because the amount of insulin it was putting in wasn't working because of all these factors that
are getting worse. So you keep on going down the scale as the pancreas puts out more and more
insulin, it's working harder and harder, but then it gets to the stage where it can't put out enough
insulin to get that blood glucose into the cells to turn into energy and then you are diabetic.
That gives another level of problems because the body does not want high glucose in the blood,
we measure this with this thing called HbA1c, because high glucose in the blood,
it's what called glycosylates everything, it attaches sugar to all these proteins around
the place. And these protein molecules, once they have sugar attached to them, they become what we
call, and those protein molecules with sugar on them are called AGEs, advanced glycation end
products. So we've got all these AGEs running around the body, but then those AGEs become
reactive and get called RAGEs. So we've now got RAGEs running around the body. These produce more
oxidative damage. So now we've got insulin resistance going on the cells, so the glucose
can't get into the cells to turn into energy, the glucose is going across to fat stores,
the body's trying to make more insulin to get the glucose across, but it can't make enough insulin,
the pancreas is getting tired, glucose levels are going up higher, the glucose levels themselves
start causing damage.
and then the pancreas fails. It cannot make enough insulin to get the glucose into the blood cells.
The point at which the pancreas fails is the point at which type 2 diabetes converts to
insulin dependent diabetes, right? Type 2 non-insulin dependent converts to insulin
dependent because the pancreas is then run out. So it's a process. It's a process.
Okay. Sorry to speak over you, but is that reversible?
That's what I was about to say. There is always a degree of reversibility.
How much we are able to restore pancreatic function depends on how much actual damage
has happened to the pancreas. Okay. So with all these organ things, dysfunction,
dysfunction is a step before damage. So we can get pancreatic dysfunction. As it says,
I'm just too tired. I can't put out any more insulin. If we keep trying to push it,
that dysfunction becomes damage. So it depends where in that spectrum it is, how much
pancreatic reserve we can get back. But we can always reverse and get restoration into
the cell receptors and insulin resistance. That can be done. We can always get a degree of reversal
into the organ damage everywhere else. But everything depends on how far down the track of
disease, dysfunction, damage. And that's the way it kind of goes. It's how far down the track in
that process we're at. Well, I've had type two now for a number of years, really.
If you're still only in type two, then we still have pancreatic reserve you can work with.
Okay. All right. Thanks. The point is, you flip to type one that we're talking another story,
but if you type two, you still got reserve we can work with. Okay. All right. Thank you,
Stephanie. Thank you. Hold hope. Keep going. You're on the right path.
Anyone else? Have I missed anything else up here?
Just that very last one. I'm just asking about when we're researching, is there a better place
to look for stuff? Because obviously with the government websites or the dot all,
quite often it seems to be more pharma centric. Are you going to?
Yes, certainly. There are a lot of naturopathic sites out there, which certainly if you just do
a general Google, you'll tend to pick up the naturopathic sites. But if you're actually
after proper, proper papers, then yeah, still come in. It's still worth coming in through PubMed.
There's quite a lot of it's amazing how much herbal and naturopathic stuff is actually making
it into into your PubMed. If you really want to look at herbs, then there's there are some sites.
So phyto medicine is a good thing to go into. Yeah, no, you still get a fair way running,
running through through PubMed if you're actually after papers. But general things,
there is an awful lot of baseline naturopathic stuff just just coming in through. And if you
don't want to go Google and you've got Brave or you know, you might do better coming in through
something like Brave other than Google.
Nothing else? I just asked a question there in regards to the vitamin C,
could you take three 1000 milligram tablets instead of one teaspoon of powder?
You could, but as soon as you're into tablets, you've got fillers and you've got a slower
absorption than you have with a powder. So you don't get nearly as good an absorption.
So once you are high dosing, so I mean, it's all good to keep your tablets there,
just to say like one a day or one twice a day, just just a bit in the background.
Well, yeah, John, I'll come into your question.
But if we really wanted to get better absorption, it is and cost wise, it's far cheaper.
Once we're going to high doses to work into a good power than it is to run the tab.
it's way cheaper. So yeah I'd keep a, so use your tablets just for you know a little bit of average
dosing but keep a thing of powder on hand for in case you need to go high dosing yeah. Tablets are
tastier. Yeah true but if you're going to really cook for wellness you start to not worry about
taste or your taste buds will get re-educated. The tablets are, watch what they're using for
sweetness so watch that we don't want. Yeah I always make sure it's a natural sweetener
that's not sugar, not a natural sweetener yeah and not your artificial aspartame.
Yeah yeah no we don't want to go to aspartame. Aspartame activates our wrong NMDA receptors,
irritant receptors in the brain. Yeah stay away from those. Yeah yeah you've got to stay
away from that. Okay so I'm going to jump back to to Joan. The evidence on safety for the
the injections in pregnancy is at absolutely worst flimsy, at absolutely best sorry flimsy,
at absolutely worst it's incriminating. The main trial that they used and published early
in the piece as justification for safety of the vaccines in pregnancy
what they did was they incorporated and forgive me I haven't looked at the exact numbers I'm not
going to give you because I haven't looked at it again recently to hold the exact numbers but I'll
give you the overall principles. What they did was they included the vaccination of women both
in the first trimester all the way up to the third trimester but then when it came to the
calculation of the percentages of those who made it through to full term and delivery they
made it through to full term and delivery they conveniently excluded those who had lost their
babies from first trimester vaccination. So basically they said that anyone who
lost their babies before 20 weeks they didn't count in their final percentages.
82% of every woman who was vaccinated in first trimester lost their baby.
Wow. 82%.
But those figures were conveniently missed in the final analysis so that they ended up
saying that vaccination in pregnancy is safe because they actually only included the data
for vaccination in the second and third trimester after the bubs that that went before 20 weeks were
gone. So so we've got a lot of so anecdotally so of course I've got connection with the frontline
workers and all of this sort of stuff anecdotally Medicare sorry a midwife hospital midwife
who was saying that you know a cohort where they should have had the hospital full of mothers
they had one mother none of the others made it all of the others had miscarried on the way
vaccinated. Now that's anecdotal we can't we're having a lot of trouble accessing data on this
you know we can't get into hospital records we can't we're having a lot of trouble accessing data
certainly the the initial analysis the analysis of the first round of Pfizer data that came out
and they spoke about 285 I think it was pregnancies conveniently a whole 200 and something
of those pregnancies they didn't they didn't have data on what had happened in those pregnancies
but somehow they included that in the overall figures and said only this many were lost but
hang on what happened to the other 200 and something pregnancies. So
not safe not safe how dangerous it is we really don't know because we cannot get real figures
more and more obstetricians are dropping out of the system because they're seeing it and
severely distressed with what they're seeing more and more midwives are dropping out of
the system because they're seeing it and severely distressed with what they're seeing.
because they're seeing it and severely distressed with what they're seeing.
So yeah you know if there's any way she can so she is she's fairly closed on this issue
Joan where is she out on it? Can you hear me? Yeah I can hear you. You can hear me
um she's actually not in this town I just had a really bad gut feeling about it and
I think she's due her beester we haven't actually talked about it but I want to be
informed before I did talk.
about it? Yeah. Yeah. I would certainly, certainly what you can say is that you can see that the
facts that we do have is that in Australia, at least, and I'm not certain about New Zealand,
in Australia, we have a growing number of obstetricians who have literally chosen to
leave their positions and leave practice because they are being forced to give these injections
and they will not. We have a large number of midwives growing who are leaving hospital
practice for the same reason, because they are seeing the effects of these and are deeply concerned.
The preliminary one trial that was used to say it's good has had numbers of doctors and
scientists write back into the paper and say this is false data and the Pfizer data is incomplete.
Okay. Convenient. So we cannot, anyone who tells her it is safe, what she needs to do is to go
back to that doctor and say, where exactly is the data that proves to me this is safe? Because
the bottom line is there is none. Cool. Cool. I'm glad I asked. Yeah. It was just a gut feeling I
had and I was really concerned. So thank you. Good. Good on you. Push into that and let's hope
that you can get it to stay. Yeah. Thank you. Yeah.
Back to Sue, 40 year old brain damage due to drinking. There is always in any neurological
damage, whether you're talking spinal damage, brain damage, there's what we call a penumbra.
It's like there's an area of tissues that will be in shutdown mode. They will be saying we don't
have the nutrient, we're too toxin loaded, we're in shutdown mode. They're not yet dead.
So if you are able, if we're able to get that person to stop the drinking, to stop the,
because alcohol does several things. It's a direct toxin, but it also depletes particularly
of magnesium and folate as your top and B1 and B3 as your top vitamins and nutrients and zinc as
well, but particularly magnesium that it depletes the body of. And so you've got a combination of
a direct neurotoxin with the depletion of key protective nutrients. If you're able to get that
person to stop drinking and then pump them full of good nutrition, then there's a degree of those
cells that will be able to be reversed, but there will be an area that have been damaged and killed.
That's when we come to the next level of everything, which can only be done if this
person is motivated because the next level is retraining the brain. And that's where we come
back into the brain that heals itself. Sorry, I had a message flash up that took my attention
for a second there. So that's the next level is brain retraining, which we know from the
background research now and in neuroplasticity can be done, but that's hard work as well.
So yes, so really how much can be done is going to be both dependent on whether they're going to
be prepared to stop drinking, whether they're going to be prepared to move into the super
nutrition to repair what they can, and then whether they're going to be prepared to actually
do the brain retraining to get other parts of the brain to kick in and work around what's
been damaged. Can be done, but motivation really is the factor. Yeah. So the nutrients that they
need particularly is magnesium zinc, B1, B3, B9. So a good multi mineral, a good
multi B, but then vitamin C is an antitoxin. So that'd be the starting point.
But yet there's, and then you go, then there's a whole heap of neuro protective nutrients
that you'd go into as a next tier. So then we'd go into things like N-acetyl cysteine and lipoic acid,
phosphatidylserine, there's a whole, that's kind of like a next tier. And then what we call the
nootropic herbs, which are herbs that help regrow brain tissue. And that's particularly things like
ginkgo and Brahmi and lion's mane, things like that. So similar and well, well, so you'll land
a memory loss. So again, we think about what's this meaning, it's meaning that that part of the
brain, and this is a key part of the brain that is working most recently, right? So short term
memory loss is a marker that, that we've got a toxin or inflammatory or a mitochondrial problem
in the brain, so that it doesn't have enough nutrients and doesn't have enough energy to do
precisely what it needs to do right then. And we've probably all experienced this,
you know, if you've had a really bad day, and you've, you've exhausted yourself,
your memory of what you meant to be doing, or, you know, how
many times do we walk into a room, and then we find that we
forgotten what we walked into the room for, you know, so it's
a marker of what's available to the brain at that point in time
in terms of energy, and what's the toxin load, and what's the
nutrient load. So what you can do about it heaps, but before
you get into fancy herbs to help for memory loss, you get the
baseline, right? We've got to get the baseline function,
right, we get the baseline diet, right, we get background energy
working, we do all of the baseline, once we've got the
baseline done, then we will be coming into things like
coenzyme q10, and making sure the B vitamins are good, and
then moving into those herbs that I suggested. But people
make mistake of going into, oh, I've got a memory problem, what
are the memory herbs, without looking back at why have I got a
memory problem? Okay, we've got to always go back to what's the
body's why, why is this happening? Let's go. Unless we
deal with the why, all we're going to end up doing is
continuing to layer on all these things to kind of try and fix
it, but we'll never actually get anywhere. Because we haven't
dealt with in the first place. That makes sense. Yeah, yeah.
So that's why you'll find I keep harping on about getting the
baseline, right, you know, I keep coming back to that is get
the baseline, right. And that's why the first session of what
I'll be going into is the healthy 100, which is really all
about getting that baseline, right. And then we can kick off
into all the specific subunits kind of like after that.
And can I just check this one may have been missed further up
the carbon 60 olive oil that you mentioned last time we spoke.
I miss it. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yes. So again, we've now got we've
now got that available through the centre. So this looks like
it's going so it is an antioxidant it is safe in in
animals and in humans. It looks like it's going to be an agent
that is actually going to enable us to be able to clear the
graphene oxide. So
and so we're going over there tomorrow. So do we need to ring
or and you also mentioned last time that you were going to give
a discount for people with from raising royalty?
Yes, now that's a point I haven't warned the staff. But
tell them I'm raising royalty, you guys will automatically get
10% off. So I better warn staff of that or they'll go what's
going on here?
Yeah. Cool. Thank you.
Okay, well, we've just about made it to time, haven't we? We
feel that time. Haven't missed anything else anywhere. Good. So
back to dosage on carbon 60 for baseline a teaspoon a day.
Again, because it's sort of food based, you can certainly use it
like an olive oil on stuff. I wouldn't cook with it, but use
it on things.
Yep.
All right. Good. Well, bless you all. Hopefully you've you've all
got something out of that.
Thank you so much. Thank you so much.
I hope you can have your daughter's ear on. Yeah. Yeah,
yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. You put it from that heart of love, you
know, love for her and concern for her unborn. Yeah. Yeah.
Thank you.
Okay, bless everyone. And and I'll check you again. I expect a
fortnight the full thing with the next set is going to kick
off as I said, kind of towards the end of April, but I'll try
and see if I can gear again for another chat and a fortnight.
Once we're really moving, we'll be moving. So yeah,
if you can let us have a notice.
I ended up well, it was kind of a case of Oh, I actually have
got I can make it happen this Wednesday. It was like a sudden
oops. So actually two weeks time. What's the date two weeks
time?
Time from today we'll make you on the 30th of March. Last day
of March.
That one, that one would be okay. The phone wouldn't be
because of my son's wedding. But But yeah, that one would be
okay. So we'll just listen and answer.
Yeah, let's do another q&a on that one. And I will go. Yeah,
I will.
Let everyone know, Q&A on 30th.
Let everyone know, store up their questions,
get them ready.
Thanks so much, Robyn.
Yeah, it's been awesome.
Thank you so much, Robyn.
I'll end the meeting.
Thank you, Robyn, bless you.
See ya.
Thank you for your time.
Thank you.
Bye.