We're joined today by lawyer Sue Gray and Dr. Matt Shelton, who have recently gone viral
for their discoveries about undeclared nanotechnology in these COVID-19 injections.
We're not calling them vaccines anymore because they're not that.
And it turns out that what conspiracy theorists have been screaming for the past two years
is proving to be true as more and more people investigate this matter.
Sue is an emerging issues lawyer.
Dr. Shelton has been suspended recently and Sue's also under attack by the government
for all of what she's doing.
And this is the cost that people pay when they come out with the truth.
Now before we get into the findings that these two brave people have come forward with, I
just want to get a bit of a career history from you, Sue, and then we'll go to you, Dr.
Shelton, and then we'll move into the findings.
Please, Sue.
Thank you, Maria.
It's a privilege to speak to you today.
My background, I studied science, biochemistry, and microbiology.
I worked as a health protection officer, environmental health officer, doing a lot of investigation
into infectious diseases and all kinds of other environmental health work.
And then I studied law.
And for the last probably close to 30 years, I've been a specialist lawyer, working on
human rights, environmental issues, and challenging the government, really challenging the government
for communities who have been disadvantaged.
You've been advocating on behalf of people for some time, and this is your latest.
So what's happening now with you, now that you're speaking up about these issues?
Yeah, look, I've spoken up about a lot of controversial issues in the past.
I've challenged a former Supreme Court judge.
I've spoken up for the medicinal cannabis community.
I've spoken up against electromagnetic radiation affecting people.
So COVID is another one of these issues that the government don't like people to talk about.
But this time, it's a whole lot worse than it's ever been before.
I've never been involved in an issue before where not a single member of New Zealand Parliament
will speak about it, where people are personally attacked for raising any of the questions
at all.
And where there's just such a unified response that they just come at you from every angle.
It seems like there's no media in New Zealand who will speak on these issues.
The doctors who have been courageous and spoken out have been attacked head on by the Medical
Council.
And now I'm under attack myself from the Law Society investigation.
But it's the kind of thing that if we have any integrity in what we do, we have no choice.
Once we know what we know, and we've seen what we've seen, and we've spoken to the people
that have suffered the vaccine injuries, who have suffered so much harm, who have lost
their jobs in the no jab, no job laws.
We really have no choice.
And I've also been to the High Court on two matters related to COVID in the last year
or so.
The first time we won in the High Court, the government changed the law within 24 hours,
changing our Medicines Act, because the COVID medicine had only provisional consent in New
Zealand, which meant that it could only be used for the restricted treatment of a limited
number of patients.
The government rolled it out to everyone in New Zealand over 16.
The High Court of New Zealand agreed that everyone in over 16 wasn't a limited number
of patients.
And the government responded by changing the law in 24 hours and removing that restriction.
So this is the type of thing that we've been facing here.
And another person that's under attack is you, Dr. Shelton.
So you've now been suspended, because you actually care about your patients and you
have some courage.
Can you tell us a little bit about your history and what's led you to this point?
Sure, Maria.
And please call me Matt, too.
I'm very, very pleased to talk to you.
So I've been a medical doctor for almost 40 years now.
And most of that time in primary care, general practice, but about the last 15 years, I've
been working much more in a sort of integrative fashion.
I was teaching environmental medicine and clinical nutrition, mainly in Australia, actually,
since about 2007.
So I've had my eyes more open, I guess, to the limitations of the pharmaceutical model
and the huge range of other things that can help you actually uncover the reasons for
illness and open up a range of different ways in to help people get better.
So I've always had a bit of a radar, I suppose, for the sort of the subterfuge and the marketing
and just the things that really mean you need to have your wits about you in terms of the
pharmaceutical model.
But really big time with this situation, a whole bunch of us, when we...
basically received our our consent forms actually for our own vaccine invitations and we'd already
been alarmed by the you know some of the early treatment medicines that were being used
successfully overseas being taken off the shelves and removed in New Zealand before really we even
knew they were a thing. So when we went looking we found there was you know some very strong
research and we all thought well this is what we should be learning we should be learning how to
use these you know simple safe cheap repurpose medications when when COVID does inevitably hit
the shores here but but instead we had this sort of siege mentality where all debate was shut down
and and we we wrote some open letters and just asked questions and we got absolutely
zero response and from that we knew immediately that we were in trouble and that that theme has
continued ever since and in fact it's it's almost it'll be a year and Easter since we all formally
got together and and we've had very very few replies if if any from all of the regulatory
bodies our own professional agencies government ministers and in all that time we've been been
you know writing and writing really just trying to put evidence to them asking questions pointing
out the scale of of injuries and deaths from the vaccination and you know it's sort of grown
from there and the the thing we're all dealing with now is that we've been variously suspended
or warned and you know there's no doubt that there's a there's a sort of a plan in place to to
you know haul us all up before you know before the regulatory bodies medical council
to to strip us of our you know professional fellowships that we'd already earned
and for what and we're still really reeling with the nonsense because although my suspension
judgment hasn't come out yet and also we took quite a big case in conjunction with the teachers
to the high court challenging the the validity of the mandates and that judgment hasn't come out
either so there's the general principle that you're supposed to keep your trap shut in the
meantime but but it's very clear that the first of us to sort of go public with our concerns
who did some video interviews and put some stuff on social media you know are being picked off
and the you know our membership now there's probably over well well over 100 and that's
all i'm going to say doctors dentists and medical scientists we've had some some vets join us some
things you know and we're all absolutely unified that um you know the narrative is wrong and that
people are desperately in harm's way for not being given the chance to be told you know the other
side of the coin and to have some balance and and fair coverage in the media and from politicians
all of whom seem to suddenly to be you know medical doctors and we have these people and
celebrities and sports people all standing up and and you know making making medical pronouncements
about a treatment and the fact that people should take it uh you know and here i am um and and my
colleagues as well we were only trying to do our jobs and and you know stick to our oath and and
you know be cautious um and and give balanced information uh and we're being um being censored
and having our livelihoods taken away um you know it really is um you know a real sort of Alice in
Wonderland um flip sort of flip over that we seem to be in at the moment yes absolutely the everything
that's right and correct is censored if it wasn't even playing field people would have been put out
of harm's way long ago as you said just then matt uh you know they are dangerously in harm's way and
if we had the opportunity to share this kind of information on platforms other than alternative
media and thank god for alternative media because we still have some sort of an outlet but i mean
if we had this on the mainstream if if a mainstream media outlet would give you the opportunity to
talk about your your concerns as a medical professional well things would be very very
different and we wouldn't be dealing with immune systems that are completely shattered from these
injections now and we just we don't even know for years to come what this means for for people's
immune systems but there's something even more sinister at play here and we're at you've you've
shown the findings of La Quinta Columna that originally led the way in finding these these
foreign microchip nanotechnology strange looking things in the Pfizer vials and you've had a
team now in New Zealand that's gone and and found their own
evidence of this? Can you talk us through that?
Sure, Maria. Well, it was actually in response to having some patients contact us
who found that they had become magnetised after their vaccination.
So we we had a look and met some people who, you know, indeed did seem to show some magnetism.
And we so we did a science report. We did a little research project and came across
La Quinta Columna and the work that they'd done. And in fact, Dr. Camper had already
done his fairly high level science report where he had shown the presence of graphene based
microstructures, you know, the word nano is used, but nano refers to, you know, incredibly small
scale, you know, you're almost down at the molecular level, whereas he and his team were
seeing things down a microscope. So as part of our report to the government on people's
magnetism concerns, we included what we'd found around the graphene contamination and apparent
chips and electronic circuitry, or so it seemed. And shortly after that,
a German team of pathologists had a very powerful conference that they recorded and uploaded.
And that's well worth everybody looking at. And that was in two parts. In the first half,
they were describing the postmortem findings in people who died after vaccination.
And they were reporting things that they'd never seen in their whole careers.
And in the second half, they were talking about particles that had been found on
microscopy of the vaccine itself. So we first told government at the end of September,
last year, that this stuff was emerging. And we thought, well, you know, sooner or later,
somebody's going to find the stuff or, you know, it's going to look and find the same stuff here,
but nobody did. So we thought, well, we better buy our own microscope and have a look ourselves,
because these vaccines are all made in factories overseas, and they're all shipped,
shipped all over the world. So we thought there'd be really little doubt that we,
you know, might have the same issues to contend with here. And there'd been nothing from any of
the manufacturers about the fact that were added ingredients, or that we would be, you know,
dosed with, well, graphene is well known to be unsafe for human health, it's never been used in
medicine. But we found that there's been a lot of science going on for at least a decade, and,
you know, dark corners of the science world and in defence departments and things, you know,
looking at what they call biohacking, and sort of mind net, you know, ways that you can make the
next generation soldier, for instance, you know, super smart, able to integrate a lot of information
and coordinate with, you know, ever more efficient machines for killing people.
And there'd even been discussion around ethics, but it was the sort of discussion that was very
dismissive, and had the same flavour as the way, you know, woke groups discuss freedom of speech,
and, you know, binary gender, you know, it's dismissed as being old pat and, you know,
no longer appropriate. So we bought this microscope, and a couple of us had a look
at a drop of vaccine, and almost immediately within, I would say, sort of 15 minutes, and then
over the next six or eight hours, these structures seem to appear out of the sort of the gloom of
what should have just been an emulsion, you know, really, you should be just looking at something
that looks like milk down the microscope, really. So although we were suspicious that we might see
things, it was still a surprise. And we can have a look at a few of those things. But our, you know,
point is that none of us are experts in nano or micro technology, and the electronics and things,
all we do is we're reporting what we're seeing, and suggesting that this could be a major risk
to public health, and that our regulators, and ministers and police, all of these people need
to be aware of it, and investigate and make a decision. Absolutely, the public need answers,
the public need answers, but we've had these ingredients hidden from us, not only, we were
told that it wouldn't change our DNA, now we've got evidence from Lund University in Sweden, that
it is actually changing human DNA, we were told that it was safe and effective, it's not, it's
killing people. And on top of that, now we're finding that there are things in these vaccines,
again, they're not vaccines, that are, that should not be in the human body, and people need answers,
they need to know. So, of course,
And the concept of having a microchip
or some sort of microcomputer inside of you,
it sounds insane,
but what these people are doing to humanity is insane.
I've spoken about Dr. Yuval Noah Harari,
who says humans are now hackable animals.
So the thinking of these people
that want this technology inside humanity is deprived.
And it's the type of thinking that,
that when you hear the way they talk,
it explains why this has been done so covertly,
because no one would willingly take something
into their bodies or very few,
if they knew that this was possible.
Look, absolutely, nobody asked us,
and there's been no debate, you know, in open society.
You know, they're very proud, I think,
of how far the science has taken them.
And in their, you know, their interviews
and their speeches,
there's this very kind of monotonous delivery,
you know, the unsmiling,
that it doesn't seem to occur to them
that maybe some of their audiences might be surprised
or shocked at what they're being told.
And they're delivering these statements as truths,
and as if it's already happening.
And it seems like it is.
And no one in their right mind, I believe,
would have consented to taking a vaccine
if they'd seen the photographs of what are admittedly,
you know, tiny, tiny, tiny structures we're talking about,
but nevertheless, they're there for a purpose.
They are in there.
We now have, there are four teams in New Zealand
that have all separately and independently
found the same sort of stuff.
And it's interesting because they're using,
you know, there are different types of microscopes,
but using different microscope techniques,
you know, or add to the pieces of the puzzle.
So, and there are other countries too.
So not just Spain, Spain's the first group,
but the UK have come up with, again,
a very well done and high level science report
that was commissioned actually by Dr. Tess Laurie,
who's a name you probably know of, and she crowdfunded.
And she's an incredibly credible and successful
long time assessor of evidence for the NHS, for the WHO.
And she also, of course, has been banging the table
about ivermectin and managing to expose
some of the obvious corruption in the background.
So we've had to leave it to people
that are courageous enough to do this research,
ask the hard questions and put a face
to what they're bringing out and, you know,
consequences to both you and Matt.
What, can we see some of what has been found
by these teams in New Zealand?
Sure, sure.
I mean, one of the problems I have is that
we were the first, it was a small group of us,
to look down the microscope and come up with some images.
And, you know, I'm the only one that has been
foolish enough, I suppose, shall I say,
to actually put my name to the fact that it happened.
Because I think it was important
that I wrote a sworn statement to say that the, you know,
we trusted the provenance of the vaccine
and how it was provided,
and that we're not faking the images.
You know, there's every effort and, you know,
attempts made, of course, to, you know,
fact check all this stuff.
And again, we have to say each time that we're not,
you know, experts in this stuff,
but we've, you know,
I've looked down enough microscopes in my training
to know what natural processes look like.
And plainly, a lot of what we have here, you know,
ain't natural.
And so, while Matt does that, from a legal perspective,
have we crossed all our T's, dotted all our I's?
Yeah, look, the work that the scientists have done,
we're having four groups of scientists doing,
finding much the same using similar,
but slightly different methods as compelling.
And the whole issues with chain of custody
and that type of thing is all being addressed
to ensure that there's no possible contamination.
I mean, from my legal perspective,
one of the issues that got me interested in this vaccine
in the first place was that it had only provisional consent
from the New Zealand authority.
So they turned down full consent
because they weren't satisfied
that the benefits outweighed the risks.
And instead, they gave provisional consent
with 58 conditions.
And those 58 conditions related to questions
that were outstanding over its safety,
over its effectiveness, and over the product integrity.
So then we get serious questions about, well, all of those,
but for this,
purposes, the product integrity. I've done a series of official
information requests to Medsafe, our government regulator, and to
our Ministry of Health and various ministers. It turns out
that New Zealand is doing no independent testing of these
vaccines. They're relying solely on the manufacturer's
certification, which is completely different than what
they do with other products. And yet here we have a product
that's only experimental, it's novel, it's being rolled out to
the entire population, or everybody over five, I think it
now is, which in itself is an experiment. So we've got an
experimental sub product, and it's being used in an
experimental way. We have really strong laws in New Zealand in
theory about informed consent, and particularly where you're
using a medicine that's not an approved orthodox medicine,
there's additional obligations. We had the whole Dame Sylvia
Cartwright inquiry into cervical cancer in the late 1980s,
where some scientists were experimenting on patients
without informed consent. And that resulted in a major piece
of research and really widespread publication about
that. And yet here we are doing the whole experiment, again, on
a massive, almost nationwide scale, without any of the most
basic checks and balances, and without anything remotely like
informed consent. I went to a school when they were trying to
roll out the vaccine after school one day, and I said,
please, can I look at the form? And I looked at the form, I
said, where's the information about risk for young men about
myocarditis? We've had people die in New Zealand of myocarditis,
nothing on the form about that, you know, we've had young woman
die after her vaccine, a 17 year old athlete, they attributed it
to other medication she was taking, even though what she
died of was a known side effect of this vaccine. So we've got so
many question marks about nothing like informed consent.
How can it possibly happen? What kind of system have we got in
New Zealand, that lets this happen, and lets people die, and
lets people suffer really serious adverse effects,
discriminates actively against doctors, lawyers, teachers,
anybody who questions the establishment view, which
prevents people going into court to have a hearing, it makes the
security man stands at the door of the court handing out pieces
of paper to people telling them their next court date is in five
weeks or whatever, without them even getting a chance to talk to
a judge or a registrar, which results in inconsistent bail
conditions, excessive bail conditions, almost every
protection that you would expect in a democratic society is
missing.
It's missing in every single country, every single Western
country is shocked to see how much of our civil liberties we
don't even have anymore. Some have argued that democracy today
is just an illusion. When we see what they did in Canada, freezing
people's bank accounts, you know, now in the United States,
accusing people of treason and domestic terrorism for asking
questions. It's unbelievable. It's unbelievable. But Matt, have
you got those slides up for us?
Yep.
Wonderful.
So the first ones we're going to look at are ones that we took.
They're just using an ordinary optical light microscope, but
fairly high magnification, it can go up to 2500.
So talk us through what we're seeing here.
Yeah, okay. So this is just a drop of vaccine under a cover
slide of the Pfizer vaccine. Within an hour or two, out of
the sort of the background gloom, these images started to
appear. And the thing to constantly ask oneself is, you
know, do these look like they appear in nature? And, you know,
I'm sure she's done a lot of microscopy as well in her
time. You know, nature doesn't do straight lines, doesn't do
absolute squares, doesn't do absolute right angles, except
maybe in a few crystals. But, but, you know, generally, it
does curves and things. And so a few of these images, again, you
know, are, well, they shouldn't be there for start. And they're
regular, they're square, they're not, you know, they're not
regular, they're square, you start to get a sense of a sort
of three dimensional components.
Do we know what what this is that we're looking at?
Well, not not with 100% certainty, but we know it ain't
natural. So, you know, this, the rounding on the corners, you
know, this is precision. You know, there's some sort of
algorithm.
them, that's being used to produce them. But you know, I've never seen anything, nor have all the
other people that have looked either. And some of these people have been using microscopes their
whole lives. My concern about all of this is, if it was a food product, which had something
unexplained in it, it would be recalled. How we have a medicine that's being rolled out to the
entire community, including a lot of vulnerable people, supposedly to keep them well from a
disease that's not particularly harmful for most people anyway, from what we've seen.
And yet we've raised it with the authorities. And we had to raise it through Parliament and the
Select Committee, because that was the only way we could get anyone in the establishment to talk
to them. Because as co-leader of the New Zealand Outdoors and Freedom Party, we actually had a
Select Committee hearing the afternoon that we'd been trying to get a meeting. So we raised this
as part of our Select Committee hearing. And we've subsequently sent them more information.
And yet, nobody's interested. Now, how can that be? If it was milk with something unusual in it,
it would be recalled. It's a medicine with something unusual in it. And it's still being
actively promoted every day to vulnerable New Zealanders. The parallel double standards are just
mind-blowing. Yes, absolutely. And you're right. I often joke about if we had a defective
head of lettuce, every head of lettuce would be recalled in the country.
And yet we're looking at evidence under a microscope that there are foreign bodies,
foreign objects in this medicine that we cannot explain. And no one wants to do anything about it.
If they had an ounce of a conscience, someone would do something. But it seems like even MPs
that stand up for this stuff, they hit brick walls themselves.
Well, in New Zealand, we don't have a single MP who stands up to question this. I mean,
a large number of New Zealanders occupied Parliament for 22 days. And not one acting MP
would come out and even speak to the people there. And it was the most diverse crowd of New Zealanders
you've ever seen from almost every part of New Zealand, every socioeconomic group,
every profession. A lot of people were lifelong teachers, nurses, doctors who had lost their jobs
because of the no jab, no job mandate. There were people who had lost their livelihoods because
they'd been so badly vaccine injured. There were people whose family and friends had lost their
jobs, and they simply didn't think it was fair. And they'd come along to support them.
So many people there, 22 days parked on the front lawn of Parliament with really what was
like a festival atmosphere with music and speeches and herbal treatments and you name it,
it was their food, everything provided, and yet not one MP. And then they announced
they'd reached an agreement between themselves that they wouldn't speak to us. Now, how can that
be? That's effectively a conspiracy between our elected representatives that they won't speak to
the people that they represent. That's just the most extraordinary. Pathetic.
And not one of them has enough backbone to face these families, these peaceful people to say,
okay, let us hear your concerns. No, instead they paint them as terrorists in the mainstream media
and make people think, keep the delusion going for everyone that's in this state of
cognitive dissonance that still can't see the problem with now five doses being on the cards.
It's just a disgrace. It's a disgrace these people aren't deserving of their paychecks.
They are deserving of a trial for their crimes. Do we have more, Matt, that we need to go through?
Oh, heaps. So what are we looking at here? Okay, so we're moving to a bunch of what are called
dark field images. So this is a microscope that uses a condenser underneath where the slide goes.
So it's the same principle as moonlight. So, you know, even though the moon's in shadow,
light sort of converges around the sides of the earth from the sun and hits the moon
and then it's reflected back. So dark fields tends to give a very two-dimensional view,
and it particularly shows up corners and barriers. So you see, you know,
cell membranes and things particularly well.
So the things aren't emitting light themselves,
but they're reflecting,
but just like, you know, elsewhere in nature,
if you have a smooth and, you know,
a shiny surface, say that it's metallic or extremely flat,
then it will reflect back, you know,
much more than naturally occurring things.
So this is an image that,
well, all these images I'm going to show you
sort of occurred over sort of several days
of the second team who'd been working away
actually for a month or two before we discovered them.
And they were obviously alarmed by what they were finding,
but they did a lot of quite incredible work.
And there's just one video in particular
that I'd quite like to share too,
because it could possibly be, you know,
proving in real time that there's some sort
of self-assembling process.
Now there obviously is,
because this stuff doesn't just suddenly appear.
So, you know, there's a lot that is suspiciously,
you know, man-made or artificial technology in here,
you know, and we keep seeing these very regular,
perfect squares, you know, and these angles,
and try as we might, we've not found any explanation,
any other explanation.
And we would dearly, dearly love to find some
and be told that we are in fact, you know,
the idiots that we're being told,
and that there's nothing to worry about,
that there are perfectly reasonable explanations
for all these things that are being shown in these products,
but nothing's come our way so far.
No one wants to be right about a global agenda
where governments across the world are killing their people
and putting nanotechnology inside of them
without their knowledge.
No one in their right mind would want to be right about that.
Every single one of us hopes that we're wrong,
but the fact of the matter is, this is inside people.
This is absolutely shocking and we need answers.
Sorry, go on.
Okay, well, we'll just move on to something else.
Look, you're right.
It may well be inside people.
In fact, it almost certainly is.
But again, that's not what these pictures are showing.
You know, the questions that need to be answered are,
well, what the heck is happening here?
If this is turning up just, you know,
in the vaccine after a day or two on a slide, you know,
even if it's because the vaccine is drying
and it's exposed to, you know, heat and light and things,
it demands explanation because somebody needs to prove
that it's not happening in the human body.
So we see an awful lot of these kind of grid-like
crystallization type structures,
but from these seem to emerge much more regular structures.
And this is an example.
You get these incredibly precise,
almost random in their shapes,
outlines that form.
And then within that,
you get these sort of coalescence of activity
that then produces these internal structures.
And I'll see if I can take you through a bit of a process
that we think seems to be, you know, happening.
So that's more or less the same thing.
So the complexity sort of increases.
Now, we know that people in the Ministry of Health
have been told by some of their managers
who have seen these pictures that they're just,
they're fake, they're line drawings
that were just peddling, you know,
peddling art or something.
But I, you know, I went and I met these scientists.
I saw their work.
I saw their microscope, you know,
and I trust absolutely that they found
what they say they find.
You know, there are some artifacts in this sort of work
and a good example of these.
So these are in the oil that's used on top of the slide
and underneath the slide to produce,
to help produce these dark field images
of very high magnification.
So, you know, we recognize what they are
and we know to discount them.
But, you know, all of this stuff, you know,
this isn't a scratch on the lens or, you know,
a piece of dust that's blown in through the window
and settled on the slide.
There are just simply too many of them.
So let me just flick through and then I might,
I think we've got a close up one now.
So again, this is an example of the sort of structures
that seem to just appear out of the ether
and gradually organize themselves.
And these background dots that on video
are constantly moving around, even on a dry slide,
presumably by sort of electrostatic forces
of repulsion and contraction,
seem to be the sort of progenitor, you know,
eggs out of which a lot of this other stuff happens.
So you get these little donut things forming.
So they look like they're sort of hollow
and then they seem to organize.
themselves and you get these sort of solid outlines appearing and then within the outline
you then get a lot of sort of concentration of activity.
So does that mean they're self-aware Matt?
Oh I would doubt they're self-aware but there's certainly some sort of process that almost
certainly uses synthetic DNA crystals as a driver because that's you know that's been
discovered to be the perfect source of information you know it's done very well in biology for
billions of years and you know it's everyday science.
And then what we can end up with is these very complex shapes that are obviously sort
of self-assembling you know and notice how sharp these corners are and these will be
very thin structures and although they're small you know you don't have to work hard
to imagine the sort of effects that they may be having if they're you know whizzing around
blood vessels.
I suspect that by the time these forms are being made the particles are probably already
out of the blood and into the tissues and the thing we have to remember is about a third
of all blood goes to the brain you know every heartbeat a third of it goes up the neck and
into the brain.
The brain is hugely hungry for blood although it's only about three percent of our body
weight it gets 30 percent roughly of the blood ejected from the heart.
So this is why a lot of the vaccine ends up in the nervous system and the brain and also
a lot of it ends up in the heart because the heart is a muscle but it's a very specialized
one and again it has a very high blood supply or a need for lots of blood and oxygen so
there's extensive blood vessels all the way through the heart muscle.
We know that cardiac inflammation is a very common side effect for people.
So I will just go now do we know sorry Matt before we we move on from this particular
slide how large is this structure that we're looking at right now?
Okay so this microscope could do a magnification of up to 4,000 times so the optical system
itself could go to a thousand and then the video camera adds further magnification.
So it had quite a high megapixel video camera so this is in the order of microns so a micron
is a thousandth of a millimeter so a red blood cell is about eight microns typically
and this is one below the maximum so this will be probably about 50 microns across.
Now the Quinta Columna people say that they have seen structures so large in their research
that they can amount to being about half a millimeter.
So potentially you could see some of these things as a spec.
Now okay so they're very very small but you know if you take and make enough of these
structures over time and they are there for a reason and there's a few you know well there's
one kind of Occam's Razor candidate that stands out as to why they may be in there
based on everything that Klaus Schwab and his minions have been telling us is in our
future then you know it all adds up and you know some people are into their fourth you
know fourth booster shot now and assuming that this type of thing is in all the vaccines
then you know there'll be quite a load I suppose that people are you know people it's
taking but again there are many unanswered questions about how you know how this stuff
is made, is the graphene which has been proven on spectroscopy by the way to be a large component
of these structures, is it just in the vaccine or is there a way that the body's own carbon
can somehow be commandeered? I mean who knows and these are questions again that there are
people who know the answers to on this planet you know we need to find out who they are and get their
you know get their responses because most people who've been vaccinated are actually fine
you know although the side and the death rate has been high well yes but you know we can only
go with what we what we know at the moment but the point is we've got to try and make sure that
this stuff that people don't take more so we stop the thing while we're getting our questions answered.
and then work out how to get it out.
Absolutely.
We do need to work out how to get it out.
But I have a question.
So if in one vial,
how many times will technology like that,
that we're seeing right there,
how many times will something like that form?
Is it one per vial?
Is it several?
How do we know?
I haven't got a clue.
You know, and it's a very liberating answer by the way.
I really don't know.
I mean, we're told there are billions
of the lipid nanoparticles in each dose.
And at this sort of scale,
and with a number of these tiny little dots
that, you know, look like stars,
and I'll show you a video next actually,
in the background to demonstrate that,
you know, it will be of the order of,
you know, many orders of magnitude,
but I don't know exactly how many.
But, you know, they shouldn't be there.
And we shouldn't be left in the dark
if it's happening.
However many, you know, even one is wrong.
Correct.
So we've got a video now.
Yeah, okay.
So as I start this,
it's slightly jerky just because of the video software
that was used on the microscope.
But we've got a sort of a structure here,
hairpin-like structure in the vaccine.
And the place to pay attention to
is this end, sort of on the left here.
And we'll get some quite close up shots.
Here we go.
So there's one of these little sort of white dots
doing something around the axis at the end.
And there's a sort of a slightly translucent
or semi-translucent rectangular structure.
That seems to be involved.
And right at the end,
and unfortunately they stopped the video,
just I thought at the wrong time,
there's another little dot.
So this is hovering around
and at the end it sort of joins in.
So this could just be, you know,
something that's stuck on the end and trying to get away.
So, you know, who knows?
But, you know, you'll never see this in any other,
any of our older vaccines.
You know, we've looked around
for research on contamination.
And there's the odd paper that, you know,
quantifies, you know, tiny little bits of this and that,
that got through the manufacturing process.
But this type of thing is plainly unprecedented
and, you know, demands an explanation.
So a lot of these films and photos were taken.
What could this be, Matt?
Well, in my sort of wildest imaginations,
I wonder if there's a sort of a tube
that's being, you know, synthesized and enlarged.
You know, I just don't know,
but I do think that it's purposeful.
But I don't know that for sure.
In my interview with Karen Kingston,
she showed us from the patents
that these graphene sheets start off very, very small
and they can actually enlarge and expand.
You know, there's so many different things
that could be happening that we're not aware of.
And it's so dangerous, so, so dangerous.
And it's so important that both of you
have come forward with this information
so that more investigation can be done.
We need more scientists, more people
from the scientific and medical fields
to be looking into this.
I wonder, do we know of anyone
who's actually looked at an injected person's blood
to see if we can see something like that under there?
There's a lot of this work going on.
You may well have seen it.
I think Steve Peters has actually been interviewing people
who've shown what they've seen.
And dark field microscopy has been used for the decades
as a way of doing live blood analysis.
So you take a drop from somebody's finger
and you look at it and you just, you know,
see this incredible wealth of, you know, living biology.
And, you know, if you're good at it,
you know, you can infer a lot about somebody's health.
And there are lots of photographs
and some movies actually of stuff
that these microscopists and their health practitioners
are seeing that they've never seen before in their careers
since the vaccine rollout.
And they're seeing it in unvaccinated people as well.
In fact, I had dropped my blood looked at
when I was out visiting.
visiting the team and, you know, there were little bits and pieces of shiny reflective,
what are probably graphene, that tend to like to stick to red blood cells. That's a very,
very common finding. And I have a statement written by a naturopath in New Zealand who,
you know, is writing on behalf of a lot of his colleagues, and they are sort of quantifying
what they're seeing, and what they've never seen before in their careers,
as a reflection of all this. But there are people that might say this is a new technology,
this is mRNA technology, of course, it's going to look different under a microscope.
But no one ever told us that mRNA technology was going to be self assembling systems that are
being injected into our bodies. No, look, that's right. That's right. And the whole thing came
with a real sort of benign flavour. And it's, um, oh, it's, you know, it's wonder technology.
Oh, it stays in the arm, which it doesn't. You know, oh, it doesn't cause serious reactions,
which it does, you know, in many times more, more people than what was always considered the
most dangerous vaccine that we ever made, which was a smallpox vaccine that was removed because
one in a million people lost their lives. We feel that we're way ahead of that now.
And certainly the passive reporting systems from around the world are all, you know, in accord
of the, you know, the scale of harm. So we could perhaps look at just one or two more. And for
people with a strong stomach, and who may have seen this type of thing. Have you got that?
Yes. Okay. So these tubes turn up reasonably commonly. And, you know, some people say,
well, this is, this is actually a sort of well recognised carbon aluminium composite,
graphene based, you know, nanotube, although it's seen on the micro scale.
But other people have said that, well, you know, these are also consistent with some worms,
and, you know, parasites, and you do see parasites in the human body, and they're very common,
and you can sometimes see them in the blood. But this, you know, either way, it's, it's just
appeared, turned up after a few days, under a slide of the vaccine.
So this is a slide of the vaccine that has not been injected in the human body,
showing up with that type of a parasite, worm, whatever it is, is, does that ever
happen with any other vaccines where parasites just come up?
I'd have to say absolutely not. Certainly not in my experience. And so I just want to show you next.
So there's another group now, who've also got to work. And they have turned up.
While you bring that up, Matt, I wanted to just talk to the audience for a second.
We're talking about scientists in New Zealand coming up with these findings. These are not
images that have been found on the internet on a Google search, or a DuckDuckGo search, or
some kooky website. These are scientists that have conducted this research. Sue is a lawyer that
says it checks out. Matt has actually seen this stuff under the microscope himself when he's gone
to visit these teams. This is seriously, seriously alarming. And people must know
that this is potentially inside their bodies now. I mean, if it's in the vials, if it's coming up
under the microscope, we don't even know how it's been engineered to react once it hits the blood.
It could be worse.
Yes, that's absolutely right. Absolutely right.
You know, there are so many questions, and so much potential for harm, that
it almost blows the mind. And we've been looking at these things for weeks. Well,
even a month or two now, haven't we, Sue? And it's still just impossibly hard to accept that
there are people somewhere who know all about this stuff, and who decided at some point that
it was OK. And I think that's a very important point that you make there, Matt. There will be
a lot of people who will see something like this for the first time, and find it incredibly
difficult to accept that the government or people around the world, that there'd be some sort of
sinister group that would know this. But the fact of the matter is that we've got evidence now that
certain batches were released, that Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, they knew that certain batches
were causing the majority of the adverse events. And yet, we've seen them come out in cycles.
Certain batches caused the most deaths. We've seen that come out in cycles. We've seen evidence.
that there's biolabs that are linked to this research
to release harmful viruses on humanity
and proof that Moderna have used,
that they've been doing this research long before
in order to, you know, the cancer patents,
all of this is very hard for a person
that's just hit the scene to accept.
But the reality is that there is so much evidence
out there right now, 40% increase in all cause mortality
amongst insurance agencies.
You can't deny, but this is next level.
This is like, okay, so we know that they're harmful.
We know that there's adverse events,
but now we know that there's also undeclared nanotechnology
inside these injections and we need answers.
Yeah, and look, it's so,
you say it's scary if you see it for the first time.
It's scary when you've seen it a hundred times as well,
because we still don't have any answers.
And when we gave this to the government and we said,
look, this needs explanation and they haven't answered it.
So like you said, it's not something
that someone just found on the internet.
This is found by some of our best doctors and scientists
in New Zealand and given directly
to our government officials with our urgent request
that they address, they explain what it is,
they do something, stop the rollout.
And yet it's like, they can't hear us.
They can't see this.
We can all see it.
And yet somehow they can't even see it.
Or they don't want to.
Perhaps they've all been paid off, Sue,
like a bunch of officials here in our country,
spineless, money hungry,
paid off by big pharma and associates.
And knowing every night that they're going to sleep,
knowing that this is happening to people
and not doing a damn thing about it.
Matt, please take us through this slide.
Sure, sure.
So this is a fourth group that have just started some work
and they're just starting to produce some images.
So people might want to rewind and just compare this
to the Wormy thing or the tube that we just had a look at.
So it's hollow and there's a lot of stuff
there's something about sort of a quarter of the way up
one end, which there was on the other thing.
And this same team have also just produced
what the Spanish team, the Quinta Columna scientists say
is undoubtedly a sort of a fold of graphene sheets.
Okay, so this is another image that's just been delivered.
And this is, well, undoubtedly
according to the Spanish team,
and I am talking to one of their scientists particularly
who has done actually a lot of background work.
And if I can just perhaps recommend his site,
it's coronainspect.net.
But I think there might be a two in there,
corona2inspect.net.
And there's some really good stuff on here.
So this would be folded over graphene sheets.
They're pretty certain.
So they've done spectroscopic analysis on tissues like this.
And it's absolutely consistent with graphene.
What's lacking in terms of the final 100% proof of graphene
is the scanning electron microscopy,
which is very, very hard to do with this type of specimen
because essentially you need a flat, completely flat sheet
because graphene actually is a single layer of carbon atoms.
And this is what makes it so harmful.
So it's about the sharpest blade in nature
that you could possibly come up with.
So we are supposing that there will be trauma
to the tissues from all of these graphene-based structures.
This is similar to what Dr. Andreas Nowak said
when he compared it to little razor blades.
Yeah.
I really don't like to think of what happened
to that poor guy.
Well, for anyone that's interested,
there's an article on my website about it.
And his wife came up with a video shortly afterwards
saying that they got him
and for people to continue his important work
because he was putting his life at risk
to put out this information.
I've even heard the gentleman at La Quinta Columna say openly that they know that their
lives are at risk, but they must keep speaking.
Well, I think we're all in the same boat.
Of course.
Really.
Okay, so these are just some shots of live blood analysis.
So these white things are the outlines of red blood cells.
Absolutely beautiful.
And this thing, plainly, shouldn't be in the blood.
And nobody that looks at this work regularly has ever seen this sort of thing before.
All the other dots and things are fine to be there.
So I'm going to enlarge this.
These are showing up a lot.
So these are reflective attachments that stick to our beautiful red blood cells here.
And it may well represent graphene, or there's something about them that makes them shiny and reflective.
And you can see that very nicely on the video, actually, that shows that they're smooth.
They're pretty much very thin, sort of two-dimensional type structures.
What makes them go and be attracted to sticking to the blood cells?
Well, it'll be an ionic charge, probably.
You know, graphene is very, very negatively charged because of its structure.
It's lots and lots of electrons whizzing around.
We've seen this already.
So we see an awful lot of this as well occurring.
Let me enlarge this.
What on earth is this?
Well, that's a really good question, isn't it?
You know, all this stuff may well represent some natural process.
You know, is it aspergillus or some of the yeast or fungus?
But it's emerging or associated with, again, these very regular structures.
And remember, they're not emitting light, but they're catching the light.
We've seen that type of thing.
So, again, these sort of amazing crystalline structures with something or other emerging from them.
You know, this is not dust.
This is not bits of, you know, micro florets from plants that are floating around.
And, yes, there are some undisclosed ingredients in the Pfizer vaccines that could, you know,
somebody could say, well, this is what they look like when they're crystallized.
But, I mean, come on.
You know, this is far beyond, you know, any medicinal product that there's ever been.
And are the slides that you've been showing us, Matt, all Pfizer vials?
Yes, they are.
Yes.
Because that's been the dominant one in New Zealand.
Is it safe to say that this would likely be in other brands too?
Well, both the, well, certainly La Quinta Columna and Dr Camper's report,
he looked at four, the four main ones.
And the unit team, it was mainly Pfizer, but they did look at some other vaccines as well.
Moderna was in there.
So we see a lot of this as well.
You have one of these sort of chip type structures that then seems to, you know,
be a focus for the appearance of the crystals.
The sort of lettuce work that then, as we saw at the beginning, you know, may well, you know,
there's something going on down here.
Out of which seems to coalesce these formalized regular, you know, circuit board,
for lack of a better word, with the cereals or whatever type structures.
Let's see what we've got next.
So I think we'll stop the screen sharing.
That's just unbelievable.
I mean, it's not unbelievable because we know,
but it's unbelievable that people haven't been told about this
and this is what really should be on the mainstream news
and this is what government officials should be talking about to warn people,
to put an immediate stop to this experiment.
And even let's just play devil's advocate and say
that our government officials aren't aware.
Well, you are now and you need answers.
Totally.
Exactly.
Yeah.
I mean, there's no excuses.
No, there's no excuses.
The minute, I mean, if they became aware of contamination in any other product
that was being used by humans, there would be an immediate investigation
and there would almost always be an immediate stop of the rollout
of the product.
And you're right, Sue, and as a bare minimum,
we can call it a contamination, as a bare minimum.
I mean, it's much worse than that from what we're seeing here.
but as a bare minimum this is a contamination that needs to be controlled.
And that it's not listed on the ingredient list.
Okay so we could maybe finish here just with a video. So this was taken actually of a mixture of
a little bit of blood and the vaccine and then left for a couple of days.
So with vaccinated blood or with non-vaccinated blood Matt?
I don't know who produced the blood. Just a drop to mix with a drop of the vaccine
here. But these appearances actually were fairly quick. I think it was within three or four hours
when they had a look. So let me just flick it on. And remember you know the question is
do we think these structures we're looking at appear you know occur naturally?
You know or is there the hand of you know the hand of man all over it?
Sounds a bit of changing focus sometimes.
I mean again what is this? What is it going to do to people?
So this is what we're seeing is the microscope changing focus.
And just being moved around.
Do we know how long after the vial and the blood was mixed these started to appear Matt?
Yeah well certainly we you know we started seeing things within 15 minutes.
With you know temperature has an awful lot to do. So graphene you know is a remarkable substance
and its properties and behaviors change according to pH and temperature and sound
and light and UV and of course EMFs as well.
So remembering some of the pictures that we've already seen before this is all entirely consistent.
You know there is a process of construction happening.
And it's conjecture entirely conjecture you know what might happen next.
Well okay so I want to briefly talk about what's happened since you've taken this evidence.
So Sue you're saying you've taken this the police know, government officials know
and you've heard radio silence in response correct?
Absolutely not a peep out of them nothing constructive at all.
And it's not like we're short of police at the parliament occupation there were hundreds of
police. And yet when we want a police officer to invest the suspected contamination of a medicine
there is not one that is willing to do what we're asking them to do.
So what are the next steps for New Zealanders right now?
My view is mass public protest just refusal to obey. We have no choice we can't trust the
establishment. The establishment are not acting in the interests of our people.
They're lying to us they're continuing to claim that this experimental substance is safe and
effective. And clearly I mean the evidence we've got from from so many sources is not safe and
it's not effective. And it looks like it's downright dangerous for a lot of people even
on the short term effects. I've got so many clients who have had family members who have died
or have had people with serious injuries it's just absolutely heartbreaking. And you know we know
we know we know it's dangerous in the short term. We don't know what the longer term effects will be
but the indications are that that's not healthy at all either. We've seen all the patent applications
for all of this type of artificial intelligence in these different products. We've seen that New
Zealand is a trial country for artificial intelligence rollout and our legal regime.
And we've seen deathly silence of every single one of our elected representatives who are supposed
to be acting in the public interest and who are for juicery duties. So we can't trust anybody
who's employed or elected to represent our interests. We're in a dire situation.
Yeah and I think we just have to try and tell as many people as possible
and you know get this information out to the public because it's going to take you know mass
awareness. And the thing that will wake people up from the sort of somewhat hypnotized state
that a lot of people are in around fear of Covid is just going to have to be a greater fear
unfortunately. But as I say most people still...
Interesting statement, actually. That's a very interesting statement. Maybe that's what it'll
take to snap them out. The whole idea is just so outlandish to people that haven't been,
you know, following vaguely what the WAF and people like that have been, you know,
proclaiming will be our future, you know, transhumanism and human 2.0, that it's very
easy to just get completely overwhelmed and switch off. And look, that's fine if they want to,
you know, stay in some sort of mute passivity, but the rest of us can't help but want to get
on and help. Well, help everyone, you know, and the thing that came out of the protest,
you know, given how many vaccinated people were actually at the camp in Wellington,
they'd either been vaccine damaged, or they just had realized that a life of endless boosters that
they were being promised, actually may well come with some downside. You know, all, you know,
everyone has to get in the game. And we're fighting really, really hard, actually, for,
you know, more for the vaccinated people, certainly on this issue than, you know,
to protect ourselves as a sort of discriminated against minority. Because, you know, it has to
stop, it has to stop immediately. So we can take stock, investigate, then figure out, you know,
what, if anything, we need to do about this stuff that's in everybody. You know, it may be that in
time, the body will just get rid of it. But, you know, we, you know, we're very, very worried about
the potential for, you know, the fifth generation technology, because the reasons that we are given,
why it's good for us to be hooked up to the internet, so we can upload our biometric ID,
sorry, our biometric health data. And, you know, someone will always know where we are, you know,
we can be tracked and traced and things. And I mean, and that's a given, that's not conspiracy
theory or science fiction. It's absolute fact. But if you can be, if you can upload, you can be
downloaded to as well. And what we've learned is that graphene has a very, very unique
electrochemical property, where it will receive
pretty much exactly 26 gigahertz. This is where this field effect is most potent.
And it will then up multiply that frequency into the terahertz range, which is, you know, much,
much higher frequency. So it's emitting terahertz level signals. Now, if that's going to happen in
the human body, because you've already integrated all these tiny graphene based sort of, you know,
nano routers and modems and, and, you know, micro aerial arrays, and things, you know,
who knows what the heck might happen. But there's some very high level and experienced scientists
in this country who are still connected with, you know, actively working scientists around the world,
you know, and they're very concerned as well. So I think there, there's two imperatives to get
this information out. And the first one is that we need to wake people up to the fact that they
really, they need to make a hard decision whether they ever want to have any more of this
put into their bodies. But the second thing is, we need to start talking about, you know, the plans
for the 5g and rolling it out, because, you know, by some bizarre coincidence, the standard that has
been chosen for a lot of countries to, you know, start broadcasting in the gigahertz range just
happens to be 26 gigahertz. You know, that's, that's been planned and rolled out, you know,
since before COVID, and since before the vaccines were dreamt up, well, officially dreamt up anyway.
So that, again, is another coincidence, just too far, but I think we've got to start speaking about,
and again, prove us wrong. You know, please, for God's sake, tell us that we are, we are as
wacky as we sound. But you know, there's just there are too many facts, and too many things
that you have to just rationalise away in order to sleep well at night and not worry about this stuff.
So I think we've just got to keep talking as long as we're upright and breathing.
I agree, we have to keep getting the truth out. And people often tell me people aren't listening,
people aren't, you know, and I recall a story of someone saying to me, this guy came into a
supermarket one day, and said, your government's lying to you, and really was over the top. And he
sounded like a maniac. And this girl at the time, didn't think anything of it. She just dismissed
him. But then she was in bed that night. And she thought, why was that guy so sure, and so willing
to make a fool of himself in public? Maybe he had, maybe he had a point. And that's what woke her up.
So I just think, it doesn't matter what people think of you, keep
spreading the truth, keep sharing information like this, share this video everywhere, head
to ZEEmedia.com, Z-E-E-E-media.com for all of my latest interviews where I speak to experts
all over the world who are desperately trying to get this information out because the mainstream
media will not give them a platform but I will never silence them.
Sue, please tell people where they can find you and I'll link it in the description below.
Thank you, so either through suegrey.co.nz, Sue Grey lawyer on Facebook, or through the
New Zealand Outdoors and Freedom Party which is www.outdoorsparty.co.nz, that's our political
website to try and get an alternative group of politicians into our system who will ask
the questions that the current government won't ask.
Wonderful, we appreciate all your work Sue and Matt, where can people follow you and
find your work?
Sure, well we're just on our website which is nzdsos.com, we're putting as much as we
can up there and we're just working on a PDF, at the moment, which has a lot of the images
in and tries to talk through what we think people are seeing and just help them with
the context as well.
It started out as being for the Health Select Committee but, as Sue said, we had the chance
to gatecrash, frankly, when the government hadn't turned up to a meeting that we'd arranged
and it's sort of been expanded and hopefully that'll go, that'll be available from our
site but we have notices of liabilities and we have posts, we've got a whole bunch of
very good and concerned writers and scientists and things and we have a lot of people that
follow us now and I just want to close with one point and that's that both Sue and I are
engaged with disciplinary processes by our regulatory bodies who will look at interviews
like this and say well this just confirms our feelings about how undermining of the
public confidence what we're doing is but we say the number one thing is public safety
and that's the number one job of the police too and we have got a little bit of evidence
across the line into the police's hands but we don't know what they're doing with it and
we've certainly heard nothing back but this is just too big a risk to ignore and to be
quiet on and we sleep better at night, well I know I do, for knowing I'm trying to do
something than lying there worrying about what the hell's going to happen if nobody
speaks out.
I don't know about you two and the audience but when I see images like that I think it
is absolutely something that we need to be undermining public confidence in this until
we have clear answers until we have clear answers if it turns out that they investigate
and there's no biggie these things are supposed to be in here and we have a proper explanation
no problem maybe we can trust the government again but to date they haven't been honest
about injection the ingredients the side effects the adverse events the CDC are covering up
deaths inflating COVID cases faulty PCRs and a complete lockstep globally towards totalitarian
technocratic dictatorship we can't trust them and so we need answers and we need answers
before it's too late thank you Matt and Sue so much for your time again subscribe to this
Rumble channel go to zmedia.com share this information everywhere because the world needs
to know.